Agenda - 02-18-2014 - 5a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 10 Chair Jacobs said he agrees more or less with what he has heard so far. He said he has some different feelings about the accessory buildings. He does not care what existing accessory buildings look like, as these are already in place and part of the neighborhood; however he feels that new accessory buildings should be required to meet the proposed standards. He said the screening could be handled with set -backs that are appropriate for residential versus rural areas. He said it is difficult with only AR, but using a setback that would not work well in a smaller residential area would make it easier to avoid screening. He said a setback of 500 feet would obviously not be used on a smaller 1 acre lot, and the noise and light would not really impact neighbors, whereas a setback of 50 feet might allow disturbance. He said this might be a way to address the rural versus suburban areas. Commissioner Price said these she has found some of these proposals to be too restrictive. She said asking a homeowner who is trying to make a living with a home based occupation to put in fences, landscaping and certain trees is a financial challenge. She said this is going overboard. She said small businesses are a big part of the economic development scheme and should be encouraged. She understands the need to save the rural character, but she also wants to be fair to residents in the rural area. Commissioner Price said she also thinks the language could be edited to be a little simpler. Commissioner Rich said she is encouraged by this. She wonders how much of a live document this is. She questioned the steps to modify this if it is put in place and then adjustments need to be made. Ashley Moncado said modifications can be made if neighbors complain, and this would be done using the protocol for proposing a text amendment. Commissioner Rich asked if this would be true in the case of needing to give more leeway. Ashley Moncado said yes, it would be open for examination by staff and the planning board. Commissioner Rich asked if this would come about through public input. Ashley Moncado said yes. Commissioner Gordon said the goal is to create a balance. She said most of the issues could be addressed by making the changes to the major home occupations category and not making changes to the minor occupations. She said this allows things to be tailored through the special use permit process. She said this is not losing too much and it directs the intense development to the larger lots sizes in rural areas. She said this about putting non - residential uses in residential areas, and the character of the residential areas needs to be considered. Chair Jacobs said he does not disagree with much of what Commissioner Gordon has said; however he questions the existing standards for minor. He said the accessory structure screening is in there now, and he feels this should be more a function of the lot size than a blanket requirement. He is proposing a change to this. Tony Blake said the goal in the original conversation was to align with Chapel Hill. Ashley Moncado said Chapel Hill currently allows 35 percent of the floor area, or 750 square feet, which is in line with the increase. Pete Hallenbeck said the concept of character comes back to what you can see, hear, and smell, as well as the traffic involved. He said those are the things being addressed when balance is discussed. He said the example of teenage traffic activity may be more acceptable to residents because is an occurrence for only a finite amount of time.