Orange County NC Website
Commissioner Rich said she is a big fan of connectivity and wondered if there is a way <br /> to make sure that there is connectivity. She questioned if the area is being looked at as a <br /> whole or each parcel individually. She said she believes it should be a goal to have parcels <br /> connected. <br /> Perdita Holtz said staff is a proponent of connectivity, but their hands are tied by the <br /> state. She said that the NCDOT has not been receptive to allowing sidewalks in the right-of- <br /> way or of taking on any maintenance responsibility. She said things are done on a site by site <br /> basis and there are requirements for open space connectivity. <br /> Commissioner Rich said this is a concern and as overlay districts happen throughout <br /> the County, the developments should not isolated. She said that the full picture is not being <br /> considered if connectivity is not allowed. <br /> Commissioner Price said the Board is getting caught up with the word sidewalk when it <br /> could be called a walk way and should just be about getting to point A and point B without <br /> being in the middle of the street. She said that NCDOT should allow use of right-of-ways for <br /> bicycles. <br /> Perdita Holtz said the staffs recommendation is to continue to bring this issue to the <br /> forefront at the state level. <br /> Frank Clifton said as staff looked at this, the reality of this village concept in a rural area <br /> is that they don't have a connectivity plan. The hesitancy of DOT to accept more responsibility <br /> for these right-of-ways and with the Board of County Commissioners not wanting to be <br /> involved in the maintaining of those right-of-ways, creates the awkward position of asking <br /> property owners to put the walkway in and accept the maintenance and liability. He said there <br /> is need for more study and a decision about how far the County wants to get into the <br /> urbanization business. He said that the state is expanding ability but not revenue sources for <br /> this. He said that if the desire is to encourage development then before rules burdening <br /> property owners are established, the issues need to be studied further. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said she supported connectivity, but wondered if there is a <br /> collector street plan for this area, because they are trying to make this more urban but they <br /> have no mechanism for connectivity. She said the whole point was to allow more non- <br /> residential development but there needs to be a path to that. She said that collector street <br /> plans are more in the paradigm and at least have the developer build the street. <br /> Perdita Holtz said they could look at this issue. She noted that in Efland, many of the <br /> lots go to the center line of the roads and DOT maintains them but does not own any right of <br /> ways. She said that the suggestion is to adopt the overlay districts at this time and put some <br /> design standards in place before any more large scale development takes place, while <br /> continuing to work on the topic of sidewalks. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin clarified that what the staff recommends is approval of the <br /> internal walkway plan for the five acre interstate district with no walkway plan for the village <br /> district. <br /> Perdita Holtz said that for the Village District there would be an internal pedestrian <br /> system required for projects on 2 acres or greater than 15,000 square feet of building area. <br /> She said that there is leeway in this during the site plan process. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin questioned how the Planning Board's recommendation differs. <br /> Perdita Holtz said that the Planning Board recommends a privately owned and <br /> maintained walkway system throughout the area, on private property. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin questions how this differs from the requirement for 2 acres or <br /> more. <br /> Perdita Holtz said the 2 acre requirement is only for internal use, larger businesses <br /> would only have walkways between buildings; however the Planning Board's recommended <br /> walkways would be a private sidewalk system that anyone could use. <br />