Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - 7g
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - 7g
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 2:43:17 PM
Creation date
5/30/2014 3:35:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7g
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-03-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
RES-2014-039 Resolution Approving the Reconfiguration of Orange County's Priority Transportation Projects for TARPO Regional Priority List for 2016-2022 Statewide Trans Imp Program
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2014
RES-2014-040 Resolution Approving the Reconfiguration of Orange County's Priority Transportation Projects for DCHC MPO Regional Priority List for 2016-2022 Transportation Imp Program
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 3: Triangle Rural Planning Organization Project Order Reconfiguration Recommendations <br />Note: Two (2) projects were removed from the TARPO Priority List: OPT expansion vehicles to implement the Orange County Bus and Rail Investment Plan ( OCBRIP) - original project #1 and Park - and -Ride improvements at Cedar Grove <br />Community Center (conceptual) - original project #4. The expansion vehicles were removed because the vehicles needed to implement the OCBRIP for FY 2016 and beyond will not be used for service in the TARPO planning area. The Cedar <br />Grove park- and -ride project was removed because the submission of the project requires a feasibility study and other planning documents, and it was determined by staff that the site does no necessitate a park- and -ride facility but only smaller <br />scale kiss - and -ride improvements. <br />N/A <br />23.45 <br />17.37 <br />This project is moved to priority #1 in the reconfigured list because it has the highest potential of all <br />_ <br />1 <br />NC 54 Widening from Orange Grove Road <br />#2 <br />to Old Fayetteville Road <br />highway projects to be funded based on scores received from the State. <br />2 <br />Buckhorn Road Widening from U.S. 70 to <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />11.37 <br />Project moved to priority #2 in the reconfigured list because it has the 2 highest potential of all <br />#3 <br />West Ten Road <br />highway projects to be funded based on scores received from the State. <br />Old Greensboro Road paved shoulders <br />Project moved to priority #3 in the reconfigured list because it has the 3rd highest potential of all <br />3 <br />from Sturbridge Lane to Alamance County <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />8.44 <br />highway projects to be funded based on scores received from the State. <br />#9 <br />line <br />Efland -Cedar Grove improvements from <br />m <br />Project moved to priority #4 in the reconfigured list because it has the 4 highest potential of all <br />4 <br />Highland Farm Road to north of Carr Store <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />7 4g <br />highway projects to be funded based on scores received from the State. <br />#5 <br />Road <br />Orange Grove Road /Buckhorn Road paved <br />shoulders from Dairyland Road to <br />Project moved to priority #5 in the reconfigured list because it has the 5`h highest potential of all <br />5 <br />Buckhorn Road and Orange Grove Road to <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />6.43 <br />highway projects to be funded based on scores received from the State. <br />#8 <br />West Ten Road, respectively <br />Project remains priority #6 in the reconfigured list because it is categorized as a bikeway project <br />6 <br />Orange Grove Road paved shoulders from <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />17.57 <br />requiring a 20% local match. In the reconfigured list it is the highest ranked bikeway project because <br />#6 <br />NC 54 to Arthur Minnis Road <br />it received the highest score among the Orange County- endorsed bikeway projects in the TARPO <br />planning area. <br />Dairyland Road paved shoulders from <br />Project remains priority #7 in the reconfigured list because it is categorized as a bikeway project <br />d <br />7 <br />Union Grove Church Road to Orange <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />17.40 <br />requiring a 20% local match. In the reconfigured list it is the 2 highest ranked bikeway project <br />#7 <br />Grove Road <br />because it received the 2nd highest score among all of Orange County- endorsed bikeway projects in <br />the TARPO planning area. <br />Orange Grove Road / Dodsons Crossroads <br />Project moved to priority #8 in the reconfigured list because it is categorized as a bikeway project <br />8 <br />paved shoulders from I -40 to Dodsons <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />15.09 <br />requiring a 20% local match. In the reconfigured list it is the 3rd highest ranked bikeway project <br />#10 <br />Crossroads and Orange Grove Road to <br />because it received the 3rd highest score among all of Orange County- endorsed bikeway projects in <br />Dairyland Road, respectively <br />the TARPO planning area. <br />Note: Two (2) projects were removed from the TARPO Priority List: OPT expansion vehicles to implement the Orange County Bus and Rail Investment Plan ( OCBRIP) - original project #1 and Park - and -Ride improvements at Cedar Grove <br />Community Center (conceptual) - original project #4. The expansion vehicles were removed because the vehicles needed to implement the OCBRIP for FY 2016 and beyond will not be used for service in the TARPO planning area. The Cedar <br />Grove park- and -ride project was removed because the submission of the project requires a feasibility study and other planning documents, and it was determined by staff that the site does no necessitate a park- and -ride facility but only smaller <br />scale kiss - and -ride improvements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.