Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - 7d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - 7d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 4:24:04 PM
Creation date
5/30/2014 3:17:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7d
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-03-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
RES-2014-038 Resolution Amending Joint Planning Land Use Plan and Joint Planning Agreement to Allow for the Possibility of Locating Appropriate Agricultural Support Enterprises in the Rural Buffer Land Use Classification
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PAGE 84 — JPA LAND USE PLAN <br />size °r gFeat °,- Cluster subdivisions, reducing parcels to at least 1 acre in area are allowed to as <br />long as density lirnits for the entire subdivision are maintained. The Rural Residential designation <br />is identical to the Rural Buffer category contained in the current Orange County Land Use <br />Plan. The Rural Buffer category is described in the Plan as land adjacent to an Urban or <br />Transition area which is rural in character and which should remain rural; contain very low - <br />density residential uses, a-R4 agricultural uses, and agricultural support uses; and not require <br />urban services (water and sewer) during the Plan period. <br />A ricultural areas existing within Transition Areas are expected to change from rural <br />to urban uses as Chapel Hill and Carrboro continue to grow and as public water and sewer <br />services are expanded. Agricultural areas are located principally in University Lake <br />Watershed but are also prominent along the northern perimeter of the Planning Area <br />boundary. As development occurs in these areas it will be of very low - density in nature and <br />will generally consist of farm dwellinq and outbuildings in support of agricultural operations <br />To the north of Chapel Hill and Carrboro in the New Hope Creek drainage basin, low - <br />density residential development has taken place along Whitfield Road, Sunrise Road and <br />Erwin Road. Residential developments similar to Sedgefield, Stoneridge, Oak Hills, <br />Birchwood Lake Estates and Falls of the New Hope are expected to continue, relying on <br />wells and septic, tanks for water supply and sewer disposal. <br />To the west of Carrboro, Rural Residential development is also expected in <br />University Lake Watershed. However, only low- density residential and agricultural uses are <br />anticipated. t=er this reason residential Development will continue to rely on wells and <br />septic tanks for water supply and sewage disposal. <br />The remaining area designated for Rural Residential and Agricultural development is <br />the Southern Triangle area in the extreme southeastern portion of the County. The area <br />drains to the southeast toward Jordan Lake and is beyond the ridge line of the Morgan <br />Creek basin, an area which can be served by gravity sewer lines. The Southern Triangle is <br />also characterized by environmental constraints such as steep slopes, flood plains and soils <br />with poor stability, so low- density development is projected. <br />There are approximately 9,260 acres of land designated for Rural Residential and <br />Agricultural purposes in the Land Use Plan. If developed at an average density of one <br />dwelling unit per two acres with 15% of the area subtracted out for streets and roads, the <br />holding capacity of the area in terms of dwellings is 3,935. If multiplied by the 1980 Census <br />figure for population per household (2.6), the estimated population would be 10,231. <br />Text below the section proposed for amendment has been removed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.