Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 2:37:43 PM
Creation date
5/30/2014 1:00:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-03-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br />1 Chair Jacobs suggested the addition of an item to the May 8th agenda to allow the Board <br />2 an opportunity to identify issues for further discussion. He said it would be good to have a <br />3 guided conversation to look at the FAQ and talk about the bigger picture for recycling and solid <br />4 waste in relation to their partners. <br />5 Michael Talbert said staff can do that, but there are only 5 days between May 8th and <br />6 13th, so there will be very little time to react. He said any guidance that can be given tonight <br />7 would be helpful if there is information needed. <br />8 Commissioner McKee referred to Commissioner Pelissier's earlier comments. He asked <br />9 if she was speaking of expanding the coverage area per a tax district. <br />10 Commissioner Pelissier said she is asking who is going to be served in the next fiscal <br />11 year, and she is suggesting the Board may want to expand the district if it can be done for the <br />12 same cost. <br />13 Commissioner McKee said he feels it is premature to discuss this until it is decided if <br />14 there will be a tax district. <br />15 Commissioner Pelissier said she is not saying a tax district will be used; she is just <br />16 questioning who will be served. <br />17 Chair Jacobs said he has been interested in a cost benefit ratio that includes the <br />18 percentage of recycling and tells if it is more cost effective to serve denser neighborhoods first. <br />19 He said this information would help further the conversation. <br />20 Michael Talbert said staff had talked about serving the existing the 13,700 customers. <br />21 He said if the system moves to single stream, this would allow for the addition of 1,650 new <br />22 customers with no new additional costs due to efficiencies. He said this also anticipates the <br />23 continued service to the current residents and the transition to a roll cart environment. He said <br />24 neither of these decisions has been made, and they must be made before moving forward. <br />25 Chair Jacobs suggested the Board spend the next 5 minutes giving feedback to the <br />26 manager in preparation for a conversation at the work session. He said there are a number of <br />27 issues, including options for collection and charging and how this relates to the larger waste <br />28 collection program. <br />29 Commissioner Dorosin said it would be helpful for the manager to come back with a list <br />30 of what the Board needs to decide. He suggested the possibility of borrowing $630,000 from <br />31 the landfill reserve fund to cover recycling for next year. He said this will avoid dipping into the <br />32 general fund and alienating their partners. He said the projected economic rebound should <br />33 allow this money to be paid back over the next 30 years. He would like to hear the feasibility of <br />34 this, in order to allow more time to discuss this program and make a decision. He suggested <br />35 the allowance of one year, with a deadline of July 1, 2015 for a decision on solid waste. He <br />36 said if it is true that the number served can be increased for the same cost, he does not see <br />37 why this would not be done. He said one other issue was the possibility of increasing times or <br />38 access to the convenience centers. He said many of the suburban areas are in the ETJ, and <br />39 he wonders about the legal possibility of the towns extending fees and service to these areas. <br />40 Chair Jacobs said one area of exploration is to look at the possible legal options. <br />41 Commissioner Pelissier said she would like to make a commitment to provide recycling <br />42 to the households in the proposed tax districts and to give roll carts to those that want it. <br />43 Commissioner Gordon said she would like to know all of the options for how the County <br />44 is going to pay for recycling for the 13,700 people who are getting curbside now. <br />45 Commissioner McKee agreed with Commissioner Dorosin's idea of funding next year's <br />46 recycling out of the solid waste reserve fund; otherwise the town people are getting charged <br />47 double. <br />48 Commissioner McKee said the idea of a motion on the floor to expand service without <br />49 voting on the proposed tax district rubs him the wrong way. He said the Board needs to wait <br />50 and discuss everything instead of putting some things on the table and taking some things off. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.