Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-03-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 2:37:43 PM
Creation date
5/30/2014 1:00:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-03-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IN <br />I Chair Jacobs said the Board did listen, and it did make a difference in how the <br />2 Commissioners looked at the proposal. He said the Board saw an unwavering commitment to <br />3 recycling in the County. <br />4 Chair Jacobs said neither option before the Board is viable at this point, and there are <br />5 better next steps to take. <br />6 Commissioner Dorosin said it is clear to him that a one size fits all solution is not going <br />7 to work, due to the different levels of density and rural components of the County. He said <br />8 some neighborhoods are densely populated, and curbside recycling makes a lot of sense; <br />9 however a lot of folks live in the rural areas with long driveways and no curbs. He said it does <br />10 not make sense to try and squeeze either of these square pegs into round holes. He said the <br />11 context has changed since the Board originally looked at this issue, and there is now better <br />12 collaboration with the towns. He said this change creates an opportunity to re -visit all of the <br />13 options for the broader picture of solid waste. He said there is an opportunity to step back for a <br />14 moment and come up with a comprehensive plan that addresses the differing demands of the <br />15 different communities in the County. <br />16 Chair Jacobs noted that the Board has a work session on May 13th where they will <br />17 discuss a draft solid waste inter -local agreement, and this conversation can be continued then. <br />18 Commissioner Rich agreed with the previous comments, and she feels that it is <br />19 important to include their partners in this conversation. She said the idea of going into the <br />20 general fund means the people in the towns are paying twice for recycling. She would like to <br />21 continue this conversation at a work session. <br />22 Commissioner Pelissier said there may be more to discuss, but the fact that the towns <br />23 decided to continue the fees next year indicates that there is already a partnership, and there <br />24 was an expectation that the County would not draw from the general fund. She said the County <br />25 has not done a good job of painting the big picture of countywide recycling. She said many <br />26 individuals felt it was unfair to base this tax on property tax; however the County is already <br />27 paying for a large percentage of recycling at the convenience centers through the general fund, <br />28 which is property tax. She said there is already an inequitable system, and it will be aggravated <br />29 if the Board does not make a decision. She said the Board needs to look at all aspects of <br />30 recycling, not only curbside recycling. She said she is disappointed at where the Board is right <br />31 now. <br />32 Commissioner McKee said the Board held two public hearings with the intent of creating <br />33 a solid waste service district, and the response was loud and clear on both sides. He said <br />34 neither of the two options — the tax district or the subscription service - will pass tonight. He <br />35 said he still thinks the subscription service is a viable option, and he will continue to advocate <br />36 for it. <br />37 Commissioner McKee called for this discussion to be put into a work group similar to the <br />38 Emergency Services work group. He said this work group should include representatives from <br />39 the towns, solid waste and the community, and these representatives should spend the next <br />40 year discussing this issue. <br />41 He said this should be put into a separate entity and looked at in a holistic manner in <br />42 order to bring back a solution. He said the County is now in a place of paying to haul its trash <br />43 into another community. He said all suggestions need to be considered, and the issue needs to <br />44 not be continually kicked down the road. He said this process happened with the siting of a <br />45 transfer station. He said the Board needs to come to a point and accept the political <br />46 consequences and make a decision. <br />47 Chair Jacobs disagreed that this is like the transfer station issue, with the exception of <br />48 listening to the public. He said the Board decided respectfully not to accept what was <br />49 suggested by staff, but he does not feel that this is kicking the can down the road. He said <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.