Browse
Search
Minutes 03-27-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 03-27-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2014 11:18:17 AM
Creation date
5/23/2014 11:11:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/27/2014
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-27-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 03-27-2014 - Joint Mtg. - CH Town Council - Carrboro Bd. of Alderman
Agenda - 03-27-2014 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 03-27-2014 - Joint Mtg. - CH Town Council - Carrboro Bd. of Alderman
Agenda - 03-27-2014 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 03-27-2014 - Joint Mtg. - CH Town Council - Carrboro Bd. of Alderman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J.B. Culpepper said there were plans and scenarios that were provided for reaction <br /> following community input. <br /> Council Member Ward said basically it was a blank slate. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said this area fits into the town's traditional development <br /> process. She asked how the town decides on the different development processes such as <br /> form based code or development agreement. <br /> Mayor Kleinschmidt said different areas have different pressures and different <br /> characteristics that make use of different tools if they are more appropriate. He said the <br /> Central West area is pretty raw and needs a more intense vision. <br /> Town Council Member Palmer said media coverage was overwhelmingly negative on <br /> this at its height. She said this is not right, and it is overwhelmingly one point of view. <br /> 4. Next Steps for Solid Waste Management/Recycling <br /> Inter-local Agreement: <br /> Michael Talbert said staffs have been working together on an inter-local agreement for <br /> solid waste, and this is moving along on schedule, with a goal of adoption by July 1, 2014. <br /> Rural Curbside Recycling: <br /> Michael Talbert said this item is regarding the possible creation of a solid waste district <br /> for rural curbside recycling. He said the Board held one public hearing on March 18, and a <br /> second public hearing is scheduled for April 1 st. He said this is to assess the potential of <br /> keeping the current rural curbside recycling program for about 13,700 units and possibly <br /> expanding this in the future. <br /> He said the Board of County Commissioners will consider the establishment of a solid <br /> waste service district on April 15, 2014. If adopted, it is estimated that the district tax rate <br /> would be about 1.5 cents per $100 dollars of assessed value of the property. <br /> Urban Curbside Recycling: <br /> Michael Talbert said on November 19, 2013 the Board of County Commissioners <br /> authorized the County Manager to award a bid for Urban Curbside Recycling roll carts. He said <br /> the roll carts have been ordered and will be delivered and in service by July 1, 2014. He said <br /> on February 18, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement with <br /> Waste Industries, LLC to provide weekly urban curbside recycling services, and the cost of <br /> service is $3.29/household/month or $39.48 annually. <br /> He said he recommends an annual Urban Curbside Recycling Fee for fiscal year 2014- <br /> 15 of$59 versus previously paid $52 in 2012. He said the interim funding has come from <br /> County reserves, and no fee was levied last year. <br /> He noted that the Town of Chapel Hill has requested a five year guaranteed rate, and <br /> the County is proposing a rate of$62. He said the primary variables in projecting a set annual <br /> fee over five years include: an increase of households, increase in roll carts needed in the last <br /> two years, incremental cost increases in direct and indirect costs and the vendor contractual <br /> CPI provision based upon the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for All Urban <br /> Consumers - US City Average, Expenditure category Garbage and Trash, effective July 1 of <br /> each year. <br /> He reviewed additional details provided in the attached March 19, 2014 Urban <br /> Curbside Fee Recommendation Memorandum from Gayle Wilson, as follows: <br /> Attachment 4-a — Memorandum <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.