Browse
Search
Minutes 03-27-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 03-27-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2014 11:18:17 AM
Creation date
5/23/2014 11:11:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/27/2014
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-27-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 03-27-2014 - Joint Mtg. - CH Town Council - Carrboro Bd. of Alderman
Agenda - 03-27-2014 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 03-27-2014 - Joint Mtg. - CH Town Council - Carrboro Bd. of Alderman
Agenda - 03-27-2014 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 03-27-2014 - Joint Mtg. - CH Town Council - Carrboro Bd. of Alderman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Perdita Holtz said this is located on page 35-38 of the handout. She said Commissioner <br /> Gordon passed out the actual UDO amendments this evening. <br /> Council Member Harrison asked if the listed uses are now allowed in a lot of other <br /> districts. <br /> Perdita Holtz said most of the uses are new. She said the microbreweries might be <br /> allowed under a broader land use classification. She said Orange County's non-residential <br /> uses are broad, so in some cases a use is not currently designated, and now it is being <br /> specifically addressed in the regulations. <br /> Council Member Harrison asked if the request is countywide or only in the rural buffer. <br /> Perdita Holtz said there is an amendment going forward for areas outside the buffer as <br /> well as an amendment that is specific to the rural buffer. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said the first amendment package being considered tonight has <br /> to do with things the staff felt needed to be done that are not specifically related to allowing <br /> agricultural enterprises in the rural buffer. <br /> She said this part of the meeting has to do with agricultural enterprises in the rural <br /> buffer, and that is why she passed out the document with additional information on the <br /> amendment package. She said the boards are being asked to make amendments to the joint <br /> planning land use plan and the actual joint planning agreement, and her handout provides <br /> context. She said the first pages of her handout give an overview of what is being proposed. <br /> ("Agricultural Support Enterprises Basic Zoning Program") and then the rest of the document <br /> gives the UDO and Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the Area Within the Rural Buffer <br /> ("Amendment Package for Agricultural Support Enterprises Within the Rural Buffer"). <br /> She is hoping that the boards would look at her hand out and provide comments. She said the <br /> Board of County Commissioners will not consider these amendments until September. She <br /> said that certain proposed amendments, such as a community meat processing facility, winery <br /> with events, community farmers market, and others really do allow a lot more uses in the Rural <br /> Buffer than the current standards. She said in the interest of transparency she wanted the <br /> boards to have this information. <br /> Commissioner McKee said no one is being asked to make a decision tonight. He asked <br /> Perdita Holtz to clarify that nothing is allowed by right, without review. <br /> Perdita Holtz said very few uses are allowed, and there are five new ones. <br /> Commissioner McKee said some the major things mentioned by Commissioner Gordon <br /> are not staff decisions, but require multiple levels of review. He said this does allow a lot more <br /> activity to happen, but his point is that there are multiple levels of review. He said the farmers in <br /> this rural buffer area need the opportunities to generate additional revenues in order to remain <br /> in farming. He said he seriously doubts there will be any meat processing facilities in Orange <br /> County, much less the rural buffer, as it is a major undertaking. He said farm stands may pop <br /> up, as this requires customers, so it fits in the area. He said he hoped people would not get <br /> hung up on some of the proposed uses but will look at this holistically from a view of what it can <br /> do for the agricultural community. <br /> Alderman Slade said he would like to see a map of how many farms are in the rural <br /> buffer area. He would like to find ways to support local farmers, and this proposal makes sense <br /> to him. He said Carrboro is looking to allow light manufacturing in their town through a process <br /> of zoning. He encouraged the Board of County Commissioners to use the '/4 cents sales tax in <br /> support of agricultural enterprises. He would like to see how the money is being spent, and he <br /> would like to see breakdown of the sales tax numbers throughout the County. <br /> Chair Jacobs said parts of the monies are dedicated to agricultural economic <br /> development activities. He said the County is in the process of hiring a new agricultural <br /> economic development person who will be dedicated just to that portion of the economy. He <br /> said the Board has been working on this since Maple View Farms ice cream store came into <br /> existence. He said the County had to figure out a suitable process for engaging the flexibility to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.