Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - C2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - C2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 2:26:13 PM
Creation date
5/16/2014 3:57:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/27/2014
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.2
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-27-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 2 Procedures <br />Section 2 7 Special Use Permits <br />(3) The Board of County Commissioners +;ay shall direct the Planning Board to <br />provide a recommendation by a date certain$ If the -Re-ard- of Geunty <br />GerrimissiGReFs does Ret so d1FeGt, the Planning BeaFd shall make its <br />reGGR;mendat,nn within three regularly cnherl I d moo} <br />((4) If the Planning Board falls to Make a reGommendation within th + II ++ d <br />(3) above, the appliGatlen shall be, fn-n.vaarded tQ- the s The <br />Planning Board shall make a general recommendation on whether a project <br />should be approved or denied based upon information entered into the record at <br />the public hearing but shall not make the findings required in Section 5 3 2(A) 10 <br />(5) After receipt of any Planning Board recommendation and closure of the public <br />hearing, the Board of County Commissioners shall take action upon the <br />application This action shall be one of the following <br />(a) Approval, <br />(b) Approval with conditions, or <br />(c) Denial <br />For Class B Special Use Permits, the following shall apply / <br />The Board of Adjustment shall review the application during a regu <br />scheduled public hearing <br />(2) Board of Adjustment shall conduct the hearing in ace ance within the <br />proves s detailed in this Section as well as those co fined within Section 2 12 <br />(3) After comple n of the public hearing, the <br />upon the applica ' This action shall be <br />(a) Approval, <br />(b) Approval with cond or <br />(c) Denial <br />279 Standards of Evaluation <br />r'of Adjustment shall take action <br />of the following <br />The following specif standards shall be used in deciding on an applic on <br />:'----The The ject meets all applicable design standards and other require is of this <br />finance <br />development can reasonably be completed within the vesting period reques <br />any <br />8 It has been the County's practice for several years to hold the public hearing open until a date /time certain in order <br />to receive the Planning Board's recommendation A determination was made by the former County attorney several <br />years ago that this practice was necessary in order to meet State requirements for the public hearing process <br />9 This section is irrelevant due to the practice of holding the public hearing open until a date /time certain in order to <br />receive the Planning Board's recommendation <br />to Because the Planning Board will not officially attend the quasi - judicial public hearing (individual members may <br />choose to attend but a quorum of Planning board members will not be necessary in order to conduct the public <br />hearing), the Planning Board may not make findings However, the Planning Board may make a general <br />recommendation to the BOCC on whether a project should be approved or denied Alternatively, the Planning <br />Board could be removed from the approval process for Class A Special Use Permits (and apparently was not part of <br />the process more than 10 years ago, but was made part of the process via procedural policy several years ago which <br />became codified when the UDO was adopted in 2011) However, it could be problematic to implement this idea <br />from a procedural standpoint when a project might require both a rezoning and an SUP (as in the case of Conditional <br />Use) For this reason, staff is recommending that the Planning Board recommendation on Class A SUPS would be a <br />general recommendation rather than one that requires that findings be made <br />Orange County, North Carolina — Unified Development Ordinance Page 2 -20 <br />141 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.