Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - C1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - C1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 4:19:07 PM
Creation date
5/16/2014 3:38:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/27/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C.1
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-27-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
54 <br />Page 3 <br />Next, I measured the impact of an Industrial Plant and a large Manufactured Home Park located <br />across the street from a development These externalities are both clearly visible to the <br />development. I compared three homes in this development to a similar house in a similar <br />development that does not have the Industrial Plant and Mobile Home development influence <br />This study yielded a market derived external depreciation rate of 3% <br />From these two studies I performed, one can see that visible externalities create between 3% and <br />5% external depreciation based on the market derived data <br />I found an additional study regarding Wind Farms and the impact on surrounding property <br />values This 164 page study can be found at http / /eetd Ibl.gov/EA/EMP This study was <br />performed by Berkley Labs The work described in this report was funded by the Office of <br />Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (Wind & Hydropower Technologies Program) of the <br />U S Department of Energy in December of 2009 <br />An abstract of the above study follows. <br />"The present research collected data on almost 7,500 sales of single family homes situated within <br />10 miles of 24 existing wind facilities in nine different U S states The conclusions of the study <br />are drawn from eight different hedomc pricing models, as well as both repeat sales and sales <br />volume models The various analyses are strongly consistent in that none of the models uncovers <br />conclusive evidence of the existence of any widespread property value impacts that might be <br />present in communities surrounding wind energy facilities. Specifically, neither the view of the <br />wind facilities nor the distance of the home to those facilities is found to have any consistent, <br />measurable, and statistically significant effect on home sales prices " <br />From my two studies in neighboring Alamance County and the with support from the Wind <br />Farm Study, my professional and expert opinion is that the two proposed Solar Farms that will <br />not be visible will have no impact on the market values of the surrounding properties. The Solar <br />Farms with the proposed landscaping buffers and natural buffers will not create a negative <br />externality for the surrounding properties as they will not be visible <br />As a horse farm owner in Southwest Guilford County and as a professional real estate appraiser, <br />I would welcome a solar farm next door to my farm There are certainly much worse uses of land <br />that would harm property values such a Swine Farms, Poultry Farms and other noxious uses that <br />unlike a solar farm can be seen, smelled and heard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.