Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2016 3:55:21 PM
Creation date
5/16/2014 12:42:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-20-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
ORD-2014-007 Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment Related to Home Occupations
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 1 <br /> 2 61 <br /> 1 Chair Jacobs asked if it could be assumed that existing structures would be <br /> 2 treated differently than new structures <br /> 3 Ashley Moncado said those would be grandfathered in <br /> 4 Chair Jacobs said there had been discussion of defining non-profits as 501-c-3 <br /> 5 He asked if this was included <br /> 6 Ashley Moncado said this was revised and it is included on page 18 She said <br /> 7 this was not highlighted in green, but it has been included in the amendments <br /> 8 Michael Harvey addressed Chair Jacobs earlier question He said the non- <br /> 9 conforming section of the UDO says that any land use legally permitted, made non- <br /> 10 conforming by text amendment, can continue in its approved state until such time as its <br /> 11 use is expanded He said if the home occupation is expanded above a certain <br /> 12 percentage, the occupant will then have to be in compliance with the code <br /> 13 Commissioner Gordon referred to past discussions of the uses not permitted <br /> 14 She noted that these uses are no longer prohibited She asked for the original reason <br /> 15 for exclusion and the balancing provisions that then made them acceptable <br /> 16 Ashley Moncado that these were always in the UDO as uses not permitted and <br /> 17 this was not a topic until the eleventh hour She said there was then discussion to allow <br /> 18 these uses, and the planning board was willing to allow them, but there were limits put <br /> 19 in place to prevent them from being an intrusion to neighbors <br /> 20 Commissioner Gordon asked how these changes are different for major home <br /> 21 occupations versus minor home occupations <br /> 22 Ashley Moncado said this means less employees, less clients, smaller <br /> 23 accessory structures, lower traffic counts and less dwelling use for the minor home <br /> 24 occupations She said the major home occupations would allow for more in each of <br /> 25 these areas. <br /> 26 Commissioner Gordon asked about the differences in outside storage <br /> 27 structures <br /> 28 Ashley Moncado said this has remained the same, at 500 square feet for major <br /> 29 and minor She said the traffic counts are not to exceed 20 for minor home occupations <br /> 30 and 50 for major home occupations <br /> 31 Commissioner Gordon asked about delivery trucks <br /> 32 Ashley Moncado said these are not counted, and there is no limit. <br /> 33 Commissioner Price asked for the rationale of 80 feet as a setback amount. <br /> 34 She asked if it was possible to go down to 60 feet. <br /> 35 Ashley Moncado said 80 feet was the minimum setback for those zoning <br /> 36 districts She said the least amount would be 40 feet and the concern was doubling this <br /> 37 to keep that protective buffer <br /> 38 Commissioner Price said she is concerned that this is making life more difficult <br /> 39 for those wanting to start a home business. <br /> 40 Ashley Moncado said 40 feet is the setback for the accessory structure, but the <br /> 41 80 feet is the setback to be exempt from screening requirements <br /> 42 Commissioner Price asked if this requirement can be lessened <br /> 43 Ashley Moncado said there is always the option for a variance if a hardship can <br /> 44 be identified <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.