Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2016 3:55:21 PM
Creation date
5/16/2014 12:42:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-20-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
ORD-2014-007 Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment Related to Home Occupations
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> From. Patricia J.McGuire <br /> To• Perdita Holtz <br /> Cc. Martin Rouoe,Christina Moon <br /> Subject: RE UDO Text Amendment that Applies to the Rural Buffer-Home Occupation Standards <br /> Date Tuesday,November 26,2013 7 40 00 PM <br /> Dear Perdita, <br /> Carrboro staff have a few comments and suggestions for the ordinance revisions <br /> 1) There appear to be benefits associated with offering additional economic opportunities to <br /> properties in the Rural Buffer and elsewhere in the county,so long as such uses are <br /> consistent with the purposes of the zoning districts otherwise <br /> 2) You might consider expanding the use of performance standards as a means of limiting <br /> further or reducing entirely the exclusion of specific uses Such standards could specify <br /> screening,sizing,siting,or parking provisions that would mitigate the impacts that presently <br /> necessitate excluding them entirely <br /> 3) You might consider clarifying the traffic generation provisions to distinguish between traffic <br /> generated by the use and traffic generated in support of the use. Are the regulations <br /> intended to allow or prohibit a resident from operating a single—truck tractor-trailor <br /> business from their home,for example? If only a single driver/single-truck use was <br /> considered acceptable,but a larger trucking operation was not, perhaps the vehicle storage, <br /> number of employees and screening requirements could be modified accordingly? <br /> 4) You might consider clarifying whether outdoor storage includes the storage or parking of <br /> vehicles that are used in conjunction with a home occupation <br /> Thanks for the opportunity to review Don't hesitate to contact me if you have a question <br /> Trish <br /> Pamela J McGuire,AICP,CZO,CFM <br /> Planning Director <br /> Town of Carrboro <br /> 30I W Main Street <br /> Carrboro North Carolina 275I0 <br /> 35°54'4I",-79°04'39" <br /> 9I9-9I8-7327(T)/9I9-9I8-4454(F) <br /> a . . •s •. http.//townofcarrboro.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.