Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 2:13:19 PM
Creation date
5/16/2014 12:35:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-20-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />Michael Harvey said all of these are possible with state permits and state engineered <br />systems. He said a project in the rural buffer is prohibited from having water or sewer extended <br />to it. <br />Council Member Ward asked if developers can use the alternative strategies. <br />Michael Harvey said yes. <br />Commissioner Gordon said part of the reason for the rural buffer is to have a hard edge <br />around the urban areas so that the urban areas can be developed in a more effective way. She <br />said it is important to remember that whatever goes in the rural buffer needs to be able to <br />survive on groundwater systems. <br />She said there are possibilities to have soccer areas in other parts of the County, such <br />as Millhouse Road Park and the Twin Creeks Park. <br />Chair Jacobs referred to the clustering option and thanked the staff for bringing it <br />forward. He said this is a gracious form of sprawl. He said the County loses the capacity to <br />have significant connected open space and smaller yards. He said he has been asking for this <br />for a long time. He said there has been frustration by this, and there has been hesitation to <br />open the discussion about the rural buffer, but he trusts the wisdom of his colleagues. He thinks <br />the County can do a better job, and he thinks this is a step in the right direction. He hopes this <br />goes forward. <br />Alderman Haven O'Donnell referred to the comments by Bolton Anthony. She said there <br />are people in Carrboro that have been there a long time and are discussing an elder co- housing <br />concept. She said this is not possible in Carrboro, as the lots are not large enough. She asked, <br />if this was to go forward, if there would be flexibility for these kinds of special uses. <br />Michael Harvey said his opinion is no, because there would still be a one acre minimum <br />lot size with clustering. <br />Alderman Haven O'Donnell said the County is rapidly approaching a time, with baby <br />boomers retiring, when a wise use of land makes sense. She questioned whether the County is <br />missing an opportunity to purposefully create an environment where transitional and affordable <br />housing would work. <br />Michael Harvey said it would require the efforts of the elected boards to put that type of <br />flexibility in the proposed document. <br />Chair Jacobs noted that the County's minimum lot size is .92 acres. <br />Michael Harvey said there are areas in Orange County where water and sewer are <br />available, and high density projects are encouraged and promoted. He said some of the <br />projects Alderman Haven O'Donnell is suggesting could be developed through established <br />processes; however this cannot be done in the current rural buffer. <br />Commissioner McKee said he supports the plan overall, but his only concern is the one <br />dwelling for every 5 acres in the University Lake Watershed. He said he is concerned about the <br />issue of affordability. He said with this limitation and the land prices in that area, there is no talk <br />of affordable houses — only mansions. <br />Council Member Ward asked for an explanation of why the County could not create the <br />ability to have smaller lot sizes. <br />Michael Harvey said the reason for the lot size requirements is the availability of active <br />repair septic and wells that require a 50 foot setback from structures and septic systems. He <br />said the lot sizes can vary dramatically in areas that have water and sewer. <br />Council Member Palmer said she understands the need for the septic system to support <br />the population. She questioned having the land and clustering the people. She referenced the <br />example of co- housing for the elderly. She said the homes in this setting are more like little <br />apartments that open into common areas. She asked if this would be permitted, as you still <br />have the density. <br />Michael Harvey said there are areas in the County where that concept would work, but <br />this would not work in the rural buffer unless this elected body wants to change this plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.