Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-20-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 2:13:19 PM
Creation date
5/16/2014 12:35:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-20-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D <br />I Kenneth C. Pennoyer said this is considered a synthetic tax increment financing (TIF). <br />2 He said the project development financing through the state has only been used by two <br />3 projects. He said the reason is that there are easier and less expensive alternatives, such as <br />4 the synthetic TIF. He said it looks like regular installment financing to a creditor, as they see an <br />5 asset backing the debt, whereas the statutory model is backed by the hope of development. <br />6 Council Member Palmer said the town is letting the County in on a really good thing. <br />7 She said the cost of not doing it right needs to be considered. She said development is moving <br />8 to Durham and Chatham, and the town is trying really hard to revitalize Chapel Hill. She said <br />9 the town is going to do this, because there is no other option. She said the town needs to bring <br />10 in businesses and people. <br />11 Commissioner Price questioned what will happen if this is like Greenbridge. She asked <br />12 if this is possible. <br />13 Mayor Kleinschmidt said as soon as Greenbridge was built it started paying taxes. He <br />14 said there are many projects that are ready to go, and many people have come to their <br />15 meetings that want re- development. <br />16 Commissioner McKee asked if all of the tax revenues are going to go to debt service <br />17 because of the build -out. <br />18 Kenneth C. Pennoyer said the town would look to make up the difference in any tax <br />19 revenue gaps in the early years. He said the town does have extra tax increment that can be <br />20 used to offset other costs or supplement the general fund. <br />21 Commissioner McKee said the town has generated a lot of conversation, and he has <br />22 received telephone calls and email from district 2. He said some of the comments in the calls <br />23 were not on target, and he encouraged the town to carefully control their message. <br />24 Council Member Lee Storrow said he has been vocal in his support for this project. He <br />25 said there are some unanswered questions and work to be done, but it is getting close to an <br />26 outcome everyone can be proud of. He encouraged everyone not to be so risk adverse that <br />27 they miss out on this opportunity. He said he wants to know that when his kids are going <br />28 through the public school system in the future there will be a more solvent economic base and <br />29 support system. He said this is a good opportunity to get on board with something exciting. <br />30 Council Member Cianciolo questioned what the financial risk is to the County, other than <br />31 the potential cost of schools. <br />32 Kenneth C. Pennoyer said the worst thing that could happen is that the project does not <br />33 see the expected development, or it takes longer to develop. He said in this case the County is <br />34 fairly well protected, due to the limited contribution of 50 percent of their actual increment. He <br />35 said another way to look at this is to consider the cost benefit tradeoff based on the <br />36 development that is happening and what the County will be expected to deliver in terms of <br />37 services. He said this presentation was done conservatively, and there is no mention of the <br />38 additional revenues that may be generated by the retail outlets in the development or by <br />39 additional automobile tax. He said the concentration was put on the most dependable source, <br />40 which is the property tax. <br />41 Council Member Bell said the towns and the County are intimately connected, and she <br />42 knows Orange County would not let this economic development opportunity go by the wayside. <br />43 She said, while this will benefit the town, the actual economic impacts will be minimal compared <br />44 to what will happen for the County. In reference to schools, she thinks there needs to be a new <br />45 way of thinking about schools that considers urban schools, school revitalization and making <br />46 schools work in a different way. She said land is running out, and it is expensive. She said <br />47 Chapel Hill will keep growing, and the town has determined that it needs to grow up. She said <br />48 she is not worried about having enough schools for the next 10 years; she is worried about <br />49 having enough schools for the next 5 decades. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.