Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 7f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 7f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 12:40:09 PM
Creation date
5/2/2014 3:54:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/8/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7f
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-08-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />4) Keep the Basic 3 -R Fee and Create a Solid Waste Tax Service District for current Rural <br />Curbside Routes serving 13,730 households. Urban and Multifamily curbside recycling <br />would be left up to the Towns. A Solid Waste Tax Service District could be expanded to <br />include all of the unincorporated areas of Orange County. <br />5) Keep only the Basic 3 -R Fee in place and create a County -Wide Solid Waste Franchise <br />Agreement that could cover all Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Collections and Recycling <br />in the unincorporated areas of Orange County. Municipalities within the County could <br />have the option to participate in the Franchise Agreement and negotiate a fee schedule <br />that differs from the fees established by the County. An anticipated time line is discussed <br />above. <br />6) Keep only the Basic 3 -R Fee in place and create a County -Wide Recycling Franchise <br />Agreement that could cover all curbside recycling in the unincorporated areas of Orange <br />County. Municipalities within the County could have the option to participate in the <br />Franchise Agreement and negotiate a fee schedule that differs from the fees established <br />by the County. Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Collections by the Towns and private <br />haulers in the unincorporated areas of the County would not change. <br />7) Keep only the Basic 3 -R Fee in place and supplement recycling with a contribution from <br />the General Fund, estimated to be $1.7 million annually, to keep Urban, Rural and <br />Multifamily curbside recycling in place. A contribution of $1.7 million from the General <br />Fund to the Solid Waste Fund would equal 1.1 cents on the County Property tax rate. <br />The funding formula for Schools sets a target of 48.1 % of General Fund Expenditures for <br />Schools. This would add $1.6 million for a total cost to the County of $3.3 Million or 2.1 <br />cents on the County Property Tax Rate to supplement recycling with a General Fund <br />Contribution. <br />8) Keep the Basic 3 -R Fee, eliminate all other 3 -R Fees, and eliminate rural curbside <br />recycling relying on Convenience Centers and Drop- off - sites. Urban and Multifamily <br />curbside recycling would be left up to the Towns. The County could increase the number <br />of Recycling Drop- off - sites, both urban & rural, and increase the Basic 3 -R fee to pay for <br />the operation of the new Centers. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact to the County in discussing funding options <br />for the County's Recycling Programs. There will be no impact on Solid Waste employees, with <br />reductions to be managed through attrition, retirement and /or placement within Solid Waste. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager's prioritized recommendations are based upon <br />suggested considerations that attempt a comprehensive solution approach to a much broader <br />issue than just the impacts related to the "R Fees" created by the recent rulings of the North <br />Carolina Supreme Court in the Lanvale decision. It is certain that the existing "R Fee" system <br />for funding `curb -side' recycling within the Towns and portions of rural Orange County must <br />change. The shift from a fee based recycling program to possible property tax based funding <br />options will have an impact on all property owners and create the inequity of property owners <br />paying for services that they may not utilize. Responding only to that need presents less than a <br />comprehensive approach to the larger issue of solid waste management practices in Orange <br />County going forward after June 30, 2013 when the Orange County Landfill closure occurs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.