Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
63 <br />0 <br />1 municipalities just lump home occupations into one category. She said Orange County <br />2 is actually being very progressive by having the major and minor distinctions, and these <br />3 standards are being liberalized by these proposed amendments. She said it is possible <br />4 to look at different things and come back, but this will be a trade off. <br />5 Michael Talbert said since there are a lot of comments on this by the Board, it <br />6 may be best to send this back to the planning board with the Board of County <br />7 Commissioners' comments. <br />9 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner <br />10 Price to refer this back to the planning board to review BOCC comments. <br />11 <br />12 Commissioner Dorosin said it is important, when these home occupations are a <br />13 source of neighborhood controversy, it is to the County's advantage to make the <br />14 process very clear. <br />15 Commissioner Gordon said she would like for the planning board to think about <br />16 adding standards for traffic impacts. She said the building trades have the potential to <br />17 have large impacts, and she would like for this to be addressed. <br />18 <br />19 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />20 <br />