Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 7c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 7c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 3:37:36 PM
Creation date
5/2/2014 3:45:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/8/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7c
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-08-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W <br />He said there are many limits being played with in the effort to preserve character, such <br />as size of structures, number of visits and size of trucks. He said there are many opinions, and <br />there have been many discussions. He said the changes to the minor uses were designed to <br />bring the various municipal and rural rules a little closer to the municipality rules. <br />Pete Hallenbeck said the size limits are interesting because there are two different kinds <br />of rural character; one is where you have a farm with the normal and expected traffic and noise, <br />and the other is a big lot residential community where no one wants that farm experience. He <br />said this makes many of these decisions hard. <br />He referred to the plumbing example and said no one had a problem if a plumber simply <br />owned a truck or two at their house. He said there is a point however, where the business <br />would be big enough that it should be moved to an office park like Millstone Drive. <br />Pete Hallenbeck said he likes the idea of changing the goal of the document from <br />promoting business to promoting a balance between business and residential. He said that <br />wording will help people make better decisions for this living document in the future. <br />He said the other thing that everyone is wrestling with is balancing the impact more than <br />restricting certain occupations. He likes the idea of screening and setbacks, and he said <br />perhaps the planning board can look at this. He said perhaps a building that is 500 feet from <br />the property would not need shrubbery. <br />Pete Hallenbeck said he has 1500 square feet of work space over the garage and 1000 <br />square feet in his basement, both used for different types of projects. He shares this as an <br />example of that balancing act of putting a limit on square footage, putting a limit on the activities, <br />or putting a limit on what can be seen, heard, or smelled, as well as the traffic count. <br />Lisa Stuckey thinks it makes more sense to get rid of the language on page 15 regarding <br />the building businesses. She feels the language should focus more on the visual impact of the <br />businesses. She thinks these home businesses should be invisible to neighbors <br />Paul Guthrie said he has had some questions, as reflected in the minutes. He said he <br />has been skeptical, not of the concept, but of the specificity of the language. He said one <br />example is the provision for barriers and buffers, which requires an 80 foot space between <br />activities and neighbors. He said this is over half an acre and, coupled with other issues, puts a <br />real barrier on people who want to operate on their own property. <br />He said ever time he reads this document he sees a new issue, and this tells him this <br />process needs to be carefully considered. He said this can be accommodated with a <br />reasonable degree of judicial flexibility, so as not to impede people's ability to make a living_ <br />Paul Guthrie said this is just part of the working life today. He said 50 percent of his <br />neighbors have been involved in a home business of some sort, and he has a daughter who <br />telecommutes from London. He said this is symbolic of the new world we live in, and it must be <br />thought through in coming to a final conclusion on this issue. <br />Maxecine Mitchell said she would like to address Commissioner Rich's question about <br />public input. She said she is an average person, and she may start a home business. She <br />does not want all of these restrictions so that she would potentially have to move out if the <br />business did well. She also does not want to discourage other people from creating a business. <br />Ashley Moncado proposed a revision to the recommendation. She requested this be <br />brought back to the February 18I" meeting, in order to allow time to work with the planning board <br />to address the concerns highlighted tonight. <br />Chair Jacobs said this seems more practical_ <br />A motion was made by Renee Price, seconded by Commissioner Rich: <br />• To receive the proposal to amend the Unified Development Ordinance. <br />• Conduct the Public Hearing and accept public, BOCC, and Planning Board comment on <br />the proposed amendment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.