Orange County NC Website
52 <br />She said the permitted non - resident employees will increase from 2 to 3, and the <br />permitted visitors will increase to 3 at one time, not to exceed 6 per day. <br />Ashley Moncado said major home occupations will allow for up to 50 percent of the <br />residential dwelling to be used toward the home occupation and will allow up to 6 non - resident <br />employees on site. <br />She said accessory structures will be permitted up to 2500 square feet on tracts 5 to 10 <br />acres in size, and up to 3000 square feet on tracts 11 acres or more. <br />She said standards for the major home occupations will allow for 8 visitors at one time, <br />not exceeding 15 per day. <br />Ashley Moncado noted that the load capacity standard for vehicles will be changed to a <br />gross vehicle weight, and the revised standards will accommodate the use of standard and <br />larger sized pickup trucks. <br />Andrea Rohrabacher arrived at 7:10 pm. <br />Planning Board Chair Pete Hallenbeck invited questions from the Board. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked where section 419 of the building code is located. <br />Ashley Moncado said the reference to this is located at the end of the amendment form. <br />Commissioner Gordon said she is looking for the actual section. <br />Ashley Moncado said this was not included. <br />(Michael Harvey made copies of the missing document and distributed this to the <br />Commissioners and the Planning Board.) <br />Commissioner Pelissier referred to the standards of evaluation on page 15. She noted <br />the uses not permitted and the wording in section B regarding the standards of evaluation. She <br />asked if it was possible for some of the non - permitted uses to actually meet the standards of <br />evaluation. <br />She cited the example of a plumber who once resided in her neighborhood, but was not <br />disruptive. She asked if standards of evaluation could be used, with no automatic non - permitted <br />uses. <br />Ashley Moncado said this was a topic at the last planning board meeting. She said this <br />language was in the UDO to prevent the possibility of a resident using their property as a main <br />center and having too much storage or warehousing on site, or creating increased traffic count. <br />She said the standards proposed tonight may be able to accommodate those uses and prevent <br />them from being unpermitted. She said this is a topic for further discussion. <br />Commissioner Rich thanked the planning department for the robust conversation. She <br />asked about the statement that prohibits the use of a home base for constructing or building <br />anything. She asked if constructing bookcases for a client in a garage shop would be <br />considered building something in a home based business. <br />Ashley Moncado said she did not believe this was prohibited in the UDO. She said there <br />were concerns for operating a building construction contracting business out of the home. She <br />said if someone came forward wanting to build furniture, this would be allowed if the resident <br />met the regulations and did not exceed outdoor storage space or other standards. <br />Commissioner Price referred to the chart on page 2. She noted that the second blue <br />box, under standards of evaluation says "body shop, hauling, and building." <br />Ashley Moncado said this is just a general comment as part of a summary chart to use in <br />referencing the amendments in attachment 2. <br />Commissioner Price asked if these standards are for the rural buffer or the rural area in <br />general. She said some of the standards are very restrictive and would not matter in a rural <br />area. She questioned whether this might hurt rural people, rather than help them in the effort to <br />open a home business. <br />