Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2016 7:58:38 AM
Creation date
5/2/2014 2:38:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/8/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-08-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> 1 and disparate groups. She said 57 percent of property owners use curbside recycling at least <br /> 2 once a month, and 43 percent find curbside recycling impractical and many of these use the <br /> 3 convenience centers. She believes a solution can be found that is more equitable and meets <br /> 4 the needs of more residents. <br /> 5 2. Changing conditions such as the new funding laws, lost revenue from the landfill and the <br /> 6 need for new equipment offer the opportunity to re-evaluate how we do business —to benefit <br /> 7 from economies of scale and create more tightly integrated and cost effective programs. <br /> 8 She said this is supported by the Commission for the Environment, but it is not built into this <br /> 9 solution. She said the County should be working more closely with the towns, which would <br /> 10 allow this issue to be approached based on use patterns rather than jurisdiction. <br /> 11 3. Changing conditions also offer us a chance to look at new technologies — including the <br /> 12 opportunities to have trash and recycling picked up at the same time. <br /> 13 4. More complete data and information, presented in a user-friendly way is necessary to make <br /> 14 this a transparent process and inform members of the community about the costs, benefits and <br /> 15 trade-offs of these decisions. <br /> 16 Ken Robinson said he does recycle everything, and because of this he only makes one <br /> 17 trip a month to the convenience center to take trash. He said he is hearing that the funding <br /> 18 source is lost, and that needs to be fixed; however the focus needs to be on improving recycling <br /> 19 and not just working to get some more money. He said he has tried curbside, and it didn't <br /> 20 work. He does not think this is the way to go. He said help should be given to those who need <br /> 21 it and have no alternative. He said the Board should look at ways to improve recycling and not <br /> 22 just collect funds. He suggested a fee-for-service system, and he said he would like to see the <br /> 23 County restore more days at the convenience center. He said if funding is needed, then a small <br /> 24 tax should be done for all, not just for some. <br /> 25 Jeanette O' Conner said she is in favor of the service tax district, and the successful <br /> 26 counties use a tax such as this. She said an opt-out system tends to decrease the amount of <br /> 27 material being recycled. She said successful counties have some sort of tax. <br /> 28 Tracy Noonan said she is in support of recycling; however she is not in support of either <br /> 29 of these options. She understands the subscription service has its limitations and a tax district <br /> 30 based on tax value seems very unfair. She said a home value does not determine how much a <br /> 31 person recycles. She would be interested in knowing the average home value in the proposed <br /> 32 district. She said she is fine with paying a fee for a service but not a fee that is much higher <br /> 33 than what she is paying now, with no new improvements. She feels there is a hidden increase <br /> 34 for a lot of the residents, and she does not think this is fair. She suggested the use of a straight <br /> 35 fee or a tiered tax system. <br /> 36 Ed Sirkee said he believes the Board has already made up their minds to raise taxes. <br /> 37 He said the original literature stated that the manager and attorney had concerns in 2012 that <br /> 38 the fee was illegal. He asked why the Orange County waste control center fee is allowed, and <br /> 39 not the 3-r fee. He asked what would be required to change the statutory requirements. He <br /> 40 does not feel that Orange County can justify a recycling collection with a tax increase. He said <br /> 41 a retired couple on a fixed income living in a house with a value of$280,000 would pay more <br /> 42 than a family of 4 living in a house with a tax value of$200,000. He said this does not make <br /> 43 any sense, and it is unjust. <br /> 44 Teresa Edwards lives on White Cross Road, and she said this proposed system does <br /> 45 not make sense. She said she speaks for 5 of the 6 homes in her community, and all of the <br /> 46 residents are avid recyclers. She said it does not make sense to pay for a service that will <br /> 47 never be used. She said the residents live on a private gravel road, and her house, which is the <br /> 48 closest to the road, is still four-tenths of a mile from the curb. She said if she is going to put the <br /> 49 materials in her car, she is going to take it on to the convenience center. She asked for a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.