Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2016 7:58:38 AM
Creation date
5/2/2014 2:38:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/8/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-08-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> 1 said recycling reduces solid waste, removes roadside litter, reduces energy use, and eliminates <br /> 2 sources of air pollution. He said the cost is relatively low compared to the benefit. <br /> 3 Barry Katz said he is a resident of Falls of New Hope. He said the curbside pickup <br /> 4 service has been very popular in his neighborhood. He referred to a list of 120 product <br /> 5 categories made from recycled material. He said this product list is from a staunchly <br /> 6 conservative county with an award winning solid waste and recycling program. He read from <br /> 7 the provided list of recycled products. He said recycling does not have to be viewed as a <br /> 8 partisan political issue. He said everyone benefits from the re-use of home and business <br /> 9 recovery material, and it is impossible to opt-out of the use of such items. He questioned why <br /> 10 people should opt out of paying for them. He said regular neighborhood recycling pickup <br /> 11 service is the best way to create and sustain this practice. He urged the County to create the <br /> 12 solid waste district. <br /> 13 Steve Hopper said he is from Efland, and he is opposed to the solid waste tax district. <br /> 14 He said the provided document states that the district would be improving this service but that is <br /> 15 a false statement. He said the County is only picking and choosing some areas. He said the <br /> 16 method of funding is offensive to him because it is a progressive tax. He said the cost to each <br /> 17 household should be the same, but it is not. He said it does not cost more to provide recycling <br /> 18 for a $200,000 house than a $100,000 house. He said this does not meet the common sense <br /> 19 test, and it sounds to him like income re-distribution. He said their local government should not <br /> 20 be doing this. He said it costs the County the same amount to pick up his recycling as it costs <br /> 21 to pick up his neighbors, but he has never used this service. He said he takes his recycling <br /> 22 when he takes his garbage, as this just makes sense. He questioned whether this tax is to be <br /> 23 made for the improvements alone or for unimproved land as well. <br /> 24 Larry Snipes said the Board is discriminating against the residents of Orange County, as <br /> 25 the Board is only charging this tax to part of the County. <br /> 26 Bonnie Hauser said she is strongly committed to waste reduction. She said that <br /> 27 Catawba County ranks first in the state for recycling, and that program is funded with fees that <br /> 28 reward good recycling behavior with discounts and other incentives. She said the towns in <br /> 29 Catawba control all of the curbside trash and recycling programs, and the unincorporated areas <br /> 30 have a waste and recycling franchise that charges $25 per month for trash collection and <br /> 31 discounts this to $19 per month for residents who also recycle. She said RFID chips are placed <br /> 32 on recycling bins, and residents who don't use the bins once a month are charged the higher <br /> 33 fee. She said the program is outsourced to a vendor who has no difficulty with the uncertainty <br /> 34 of allowing residents to opt out. She said Catawba County's solution to the issue of long <br /> 35 driveways was to ask permission from the community to use a small truck to pick up trash and <br /> 36 recyclables from individual homes. She said this county also offers a pay as you throw system <br /> 37 at the convenience centers, and the charge is $1.75 per bag for a 32 gallon bag of trash, while <br /> 38 recycling is free. She said there are no other fees charged to residents for these services. She <br /> 39 noted that Catawba County's solid waste website includes a link to the franchise agreement, <br /> 40 which exposes all services and fees. <br /> 41 She said there are countless examples throughout the state where counties provide <br /> 42 curbside recycling to unincorporated areas, in some cases at no charge. She said she cannot <br /> 43 find any county that forces its citizens to pay for convenience centers and curbside services. <br /> 44 She believes the discussion of a service tax district is premature, and it would be more <br /> 45 productive to begin planning for a future service with a fair and equitable fee system covering <br /> 46 all recycling services. She encouraged the Board to levy a subscription service with an opt-out <br /> 47 policy to fund curbside service in the short term. <br /> 48 Jeanne Brown said she would like to discuss the following four points: <br /> 49 1. We can do better than a one-size-fits-all roll cart solution that meets the needs of only 57 <br /> 50 percent of area property owners. She said County data shows the affected area has two large <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.