Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
C: <br />• Applicant testimony from Mr. Louis lannone, Mr. Bret <br />Niemann, Mr. Gabriel Cantor, and Mr. Richard Kirkland, on <br />how the project complied with the UDO <br />and <br />• A lack of competent material and substantial evidence entered <br />into the record demonstrating the project's lack of compliance <br />with established standards. <br />If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find <br />the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c), the <br />Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is <br />absent and explain what, if any, evidence is in the record disputing the <br />claims of the applicant that they are in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) <br />(2) (c). <br />7. Motion to either approve or deny the Special Use Permit <br />If the motion is to approve the Special Use Permit, this motion would also need to <br />include language indicating the BOCC imposes the recommended conditions as detailed <br />within Attachment 7 of the abstract package. Second. Vote <br />