Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
M <br />compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b) this list must be read verbatim <br />so it is in the record. <br />• Staff abstract and attachments, including the SUP application <br />and site plan. <br />• Staff testimony on the project's compliance with the LIDO from <br />the Public Hearing and the March /April Planning Board <br />meetings. <br />• Applicant testimony from Mr. Louis lannone, Mr. Bret <br />Niemann, Mr. Gabriel Cantor, and Mr. Richard Kirkland, on <br />how the project complied with the UDO including the affidavit <br />entered into the record at the Public Hearing and written <br />correspondence submitted to the March and April Planning <br />Board meetings. This included a real estate evaluation <br />indicating the project would not have an impact on adjacent <br />property value. <br />and <br />• A lack of competent "material and substantial evidence entered <br />into the record demonstrating the project's lack of compliance <br />with established standards. <br />If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find <br />the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b), the <br />Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is <br />absent and explain what, if any, evidence is in the record disputing the <br />claims of the applicant that they are in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) <br />(2) (b). <br />iii. Motion finding there is or is not sufficient evidence in the record the <br />project complies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) of the UDO in that the use <br />is in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and the use is in <br />compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County as <br />embodied in these regulations and in the Comprehensive Plan. <br />This motion is based on competent material and evidence entered into the <br />record of these proceedings, including: <br />NOTE — the following represents the findings of the Planning Board. If <br />the motion is to find there is sufficient evidence in the record to find <br />compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) this list must be read verbatim so <br />it is in the record. <br />• Staff abstract and attachments, including the SUP application <br />and site plan. <br />