Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 12:32:23 PM
Creation date
5/2/2014 2:36:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/8/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-08-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W <br />6. The BOCC will first need to take action on the Special Use Permit findings of fact. The <br />findings of fact have been organized per relevant UDO section to aid in making motions <br />to approve or deny. The cadence on taking action should be as follows <br />a. A motion to either affirm or reject the recommendation of the Planning Board <br />concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of Section(s) 2.2 and <br />2.7.3 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within <br />Attachment 7 of the abstract package. Second. Vote. <br />NOTE — if the motion is to reject, meaning the BOCC does not agree the <br />applicant has demonstrated compliance with the specific provision of the UDO, <br />the individual making the motion will need to provide some explanation justifying <br />the finding that the applicant has not established, through competent material and <br />substantial evidence, the project is in compliance with the UDO. <br />b. A motion to either affirm or reject the recommendation of the Planning Board <br />concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of Section 2.7.5 of <br />the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within <br />Attachment 7 of the abstract package. Second. Vote. <br />NOTE — if the motion is to reject, meaning the BOCC does not agree the <br />applicant has demonstrated compliance with the specific provision of the UDO, <br />the individual making the motion will need to provide some explanation justifying <br />the finding that the applicant has not established, through competent material and <br />substantial evidence, the project is in compliance with the UDO. <br />c. A motion to either affirm or reject the recommendation of the Planning Board <br />concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of Section(s) 3.3 and <br />6.3 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed within <br />Attachment 7 of the abstract package. Second. Vote. <br />NOTE — if the motion is to reject, meaning the BOCC does not agree the <br />applicant has demonstrated compliance with the specific provision of the UDO, <br />the individual making the motion will need to provide some explanation justifying <br />the finding that the applicant has not established, through competent material and <br />substantial evidence, the project is in compliance with the UDO. <br />d. A motion to either affirm or reject the recommendation of the Planning Board <br />concerning the application's compliance with the provisions of 5.9.6 (c) of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.