Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-08-2014 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 12:32:23 PM
Creation date
5/2/2014 2:36:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/8/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-08-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 2 <br />ORANGE COUNTY <br />C 0 Py PLANNING BOARD <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: March 5, 2014 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No. 7 <br />SUBJECT: Class A Special Use Permit — Solar Array off Redman Road in Cheeks <br />Township <br />DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y /N) Yes <br />ATTACHMENTS: <br />1. Vicinity Map <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Michael D. Harvey, Planner III 245 -2597 <br />101 <br />2. Applicant Affidavit(s) Submitted at the STAFF NOTE: These attachment(s) have <br />February 24, 2014 Quarterly Public been left out as they are already in the <br />Hearing record. Staff has included a handout from the <br />3. E -mail Correspondence Submitted at the applicant presented at the March 5, 2014 <br />February 24, 2014 Quarterly Public meeting <br />Hearing <br />PURPOSE: To begin review of a Class A Special Use Permit (hereafter `SUP') application <br />proposing the development of a solar array in accordance with Section 2.7 Special Use Permits <br />and Section 5.9.6 (C) Solar Array- Public Utility of the Orange County Unified Development <br />Ordinance (UDO). <br />As a reminder the review of this item is carried out in a quasi-judicial format. Decisions relating <br />to the approval or denial of SUP applications are based solely on the sworn testimony of all <br />parties involved with the case, both those for and against, as well as the review of competent <br />material and substantial evidence submitted during the public hearing. Hearsay or <br />unsubstantiated opinions are not sufficient testimony. <br />Applicants have the burden of establishing, by the submission of competent material and <br />substantial evidence, the existence of facts and conditions that demonstrate the project's <br />compliance with the UDO. Those opposing approval of the application shall have the burden of <br />establishing, also through the submission of competent material and substantial evidence, the <br />specific manner in which the proposal does not satisfy the requirements for approval of the <br />application. <br />Please remember to bring your copy of the abstract, attachments, and handouts from the <br />February 24, 2014 Quarterly Public Hearing. <br />CADENCE OF REVIEW: The review of a SUP is as follows: <br />• STEP ONE — PUBLIC HEARING: The first step in the review of an SUP application is <br />the holding of a public hearing to allow the applicant and other interested parties to <br />provide sworn testimony related to the proposal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.