Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-17-2006-9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 10-17-2006
>
Agenda - 10-17-2006-9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 2:22:26 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 8:49:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20061017
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />• B. Revicjv Cost Estimates. In ibis subtask we will review, as relevant, the various capital <br />cos+s .For facilities. As part o f his subt?sk, we wxill asr. rtaitt whether the facilities are li~e15T Lobe <br />bonded, and i3 so, the asnortiz~ lion sch~~:le; <br />_T? i~ Of i.21CL:.lal???~ the 17Ti1 ZCi i~:s. t~2~ Colfi~iv i~~~i' II4C~L'de t~i° COns~~CL2i??? Ct}Z2tF~a.. ~'~'Ce; <br />th:, cost of acq~ring land} improve-n~ts, r_?zie=:.?s ~d ~.~:tures; the cost for pja~~-37~a. <br />stare}=:rg. an3 ~~nee.:ing fey s for s~7c~ pro~-id~ ?or and directly related to the ccansr-~ctiad, <br />s}~=te~:n ia-nLrd ~-e-ne~+t; artd deb , s.-r~~c: ~natges, if impact fees are used ~o pay ~kte debt s.~ ~c : to <br />finance the cost of the system mpro~ ~-m nts. <br />~s requested iiZ t<he RFP, <br />"the work product will r iflect tha appropriate +drange County construction and.. space'.,. <br />standards for public eleme ltarg, middle and high school building''areas and costs and the <br />proj°:.tion of school capital improti-ement costs to 2005 to 2010."' <br />I~~rk ?'r~iduct ~ Capital FniprOV2lr-'ent i'~~eeds r#ccommodating ~e~u Gro3srth <br />Tall: 4. Calculate "Cr ~d~" to be ~pplieci ~;ainst Cagiial +~osts. <br />considera,`ion of "credits" i ~ an ;-~tegraal .part to the dei~elopment c-f a legally ~~alid impact-fee <br />calculation methodology. Thy re is considerable com~`usion among those ~vho a_rc: not imm~vd in <br />impact fee law about the dcfin itian of a credit and ti~~hy it may be legally or equitably regt;ir~l_ <br />There are, in fact, t~~,~o (2) typ ,s of "credits," each ti;nth specific, distinct characteristics, but both <br />of ivh.ich ~-i11 be included (o~ , at least considered} in. the development of all impact fe.~s. The <br />?irst is a credit clue fo poss ble double pa}~nent rituat?ons. This could occur ztih~,~ futtcrc; <br />contributions ~e made by tl e proprrt}' o~~rrr to.v~d the capital costs of the public i?Sil3t}, <br />~.lready cov~,~ b}~ the impac fer. The s~:o::d, :;;icl? ~~°e «-i11 call an adjLStnacnt {zs cppos d to <br />a cr~it}, is a credit totivard he pa}~r.~t of an :;np~ct f~ dt~e for the rPqu~-ed declirdo~ of <br />public sites ~d.~`or public imp;-ovem~ts pro~ddeti 't~~ tie deti~eloper ar:d for «Thzch 'tee i~~.t fee <br />is ~~DOS~I. <br />~s indicated in the ~FP, this :ask w-iil credit, as appropriate, new development based ou naLSina <br />t}rpe and value ~;-ith public s< hool facilities costs already incurred. through property. takes, sales <br />taxes and other sources of fun ling. <br />i3jark Product:. See .Irnpa ;t :l{'ee Report Below; <br />6 <br />Tr~chler & Assoc~aies, inG. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.