Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-17-2006-9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 10-17-2006
>
Agenda - 10-17-2006-9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 2:22:26 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 8:49:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20061017
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
this t~k tivill be based on onsi~ ;, interviews. ~TiTe u-ill rt;commend tivhat changes should bo made <br />to the exis~:ng school imp; ct fees. '~~'~ ~~-i11 prc+pzre a draft me:norandpm disc~:ss=ng <br />r~.o--~~endod ilm~act fee chi 7es, dating to me-~odological or policy issues: fifer mt:~:~ll}- <br />a~~ ~~-~ chan6~ are mace. u,yv,,~ ;sage z ~~ ~~?°mor~dum~ <br />;~rsr ~ €~rc~ucl: ~ferrvriz td~j .~isCZrS5ir81?Gc~mmsnded lrrr~acr Fee ~hur=Qe~ <br />Task?. Ascertain Level of Service for Each School Districts <br />Once zne County and school e istricts agree on the various choices, we wi11 begin Task 2. Orte <br />iinpo2~t subtask is calculatin ~ tl3e appropriate Ievel of sen-ice. Impact few w ,a ly reflect the <br />e~s:i;-~~ Te;•es of s:.rtzce fcr a~npnses of clc~,ig-,;ng the ner~~ demand, unless ?here ~e <br />e~.,~'1:,.-?-.i~i?~ Ci~.lu~-`u~c~. ~~ e sti71~ C~: t~~3.iII~ ~~~ 2ppropriatC cT~?1-ert le~-e1 of s~i~"?C~ tiy~L~~ <br />addidon?1 on$ito interviews wi h the s..~ce praY:c~s and anal}pis of local d~~. ~s roved ~ th;. <br />tZ.~'?. ~~~lsiin~ sCi700I CORStr ICiIOII SL2:`?d~.rd 1'+-71 bt:. 2IlalyZ:Cl 8S VYCII 2S the Ca:~SI°i:CuOII <br />sE~darcls for nets schools. TI is information r,-ilI be used to proj~t school capi~l improven:ert_; <br />costs .o Z00~ and 2t?1t). <br />The above will enable us to ~ nsure that two important impact fee legal requirements are met; <br />namely the proportional benef .t and the rational ne~-us relationships. The irefor~ation ~otn this <br />task ~-i11 be prpared in a writ en iornat «•hiclt ~~~ then be submitted to the Count} and Schaal <br />aiJ-~icts for its res~iew_ <br />.=~; p~_ of this aslL ~-z also ~:-i11 ~-ie•:.- cost ~'~~~_es prepa~ci by each schoc~I dis~ct ihr all <br />co~?e:ed and pla-,~~i iufrst uc`~ ianprot ~w ~_ <br />l{%ork Product: See l3elrw <br />Task 3. Review Capita .heeds and Costs and allocate to Growth., <br />ini:s Lark ~s7?1 dete~ire rcle giant capit~l oe~., mod' ~sacia*.ed capital faciiit~- costs Qu~ 'th h~ <br />p-opes~ e~•eIopment_ <br />~. i Ana ~2an~e Capital ~7e. ds. ~ this subta..:~,. T:~ ;rill -=urd~er ~~~icc~~ the ~~ions s:~~di~ anc~ <br />o:h~ data. germane to the rel.v~-lt school categories. TA rill work with sta = to foreczst -tee <br />capital facility needs due to < eveIopment to 2d0~ and 2t}10. The discussions tray include not <br />only a~n understanding of the specific costs to pro~-ide the schools, but also include discussions <br />pertaining to whether these c< pital facilities needs were due to normal replacement, catch-up, ar <br />new demand. <br />i sct~3er ~ Asscci~tes, Inc..... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.