Browse
Search
Minutes 04-17-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 04-17-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2015 11:18:38 AM
Creation date
4/24/2014 10:43:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/14/2012
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 4b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 4c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 5c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 5d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 5e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 5g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 6c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 6d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 6e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 6f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012 - 8a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012-11a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012-13 (1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 04-17-2012-13 (2)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 04-17-2012 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2012-010 Ordinance approving Budget Amendment #8
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-011 Amendments to Unified Development Ordinance (UDO/Zoning 2012-08) – Stormwater
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-012 Review of Proposed UDO Text Amendment – Modification of Appeals Language
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-013 Review of Proposed UDO Text Amendment – Political Signs
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-014 Zoning Atlas Amendment - Buckhorn-Mebane Area
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-015 Amendments to Unified Development Ordinance (UDO/Zoning 2012-01)
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
Proclamation proclaiming April 22-28, 2012 as The Week of the Young Child in Orange County
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Proclamations\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-039 Resolution Regarding Hydraulic Fracturing in North Carolina
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-040 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-041 Resolution approving Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of Chapel Hill Transit in 1974 and the successful transit property tax referenda in Chapel Hill in <br /> 1974 and Carrboro in 1975. My wife has lived in Durham, Orange, and Wake Counties since <br /> 1977, and my father lived in Orange County from 1941 to 1943. <br /> 1 urge you to place the issue before the voters of Orange County in a referendum. The <br /> local motor vehicle registration fee that you can separately implement will be totally up to local <br /> discretion within Orange County on its expenditure, but the half-cent sales tax is a part of a <br /> regional plan to improve mobility within and between the three Triangle counties. The <br /> authorization was approved by wide margins in the General Assembly after a comprehensive <br /> study. <br /> The proposed light rail between Durham and Orange County will be built ONLY if there <br /> is federal funding. While we do not know if this will be approved by Congress, we do know <br /> that without a successful referendum it will not be approved. Regardless, in the early years the <br /> sales tax money will be used, as it was in Mecklenburg County in the eight years before their <br /> light rail opened, for a rapid expansion of inner-city and intra-city bus service. The light rail is <br /> currently planned to stop at UNC Hospitals because that is the biggest employee and visitor <br /> destination in the county. A stop at the Smith Center will also serve events there and at Kenan <br /> Stadium. <br /> Durham County voters approved by a more than 60-40% margin last October the tax <br /> based on the plan for expansion of bus service, light rail to Orange County, and commuter rail <br /> to Wake County. I know there is concern with rural vs. urban issues within Orange County, but <br /> this is at heart an urban transit program. You should simultaneously be urging a greater <br /> proportion of your bus funds with the registration fee and bus hours under the sales tax to <br /> improve mobility for your many rural residents who work in Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Durham, <br /> and connectivity along the Mebane-Hillsborough-Durham corridor. <br /> Rural vs. urban funding was an active issue 40 years ago when I held elective office in <br /> Orange County—for example, Chapel Hill and Carrboro residents pay through their property <br /> tax most of the costs of the Sheriff's Department, yet its patrolling benefits almost solely the <br /> unincorporated areas. Additionally, the sales tax allows capture of revenue from many Chapel <br /> Hill/Carrboro residents who may live in tax exempt housing but are consumers. I'll also echo <br /> past remarks of some residents who may in fact not favor the tax itself— let's vote at the time <br /> of highest turnout, not in the 2013 municipal elections. <br /> Let's look at the big picture." <br /> Jason Baker asked on behalf of the Orange/Chatham Sierra Club to place this item on <br /> the referendum for the public to vote on. He said that he is a commuter by bus on a daily <br /> basis to Raleigh but buses are not enough because of traffic congestion. He said that they <br /> need light rail and people need to be given a choice. It is important to move forward as soon <br /> as possible. <br /> Harry Johnson is a member of the Tarheels for Transit at UNC and he said his <br /> roommate graduated from UNC Asheville in 2009 and now lives in Chapel Hill and has trouble <br /> finding a job, so he works weekends and nights and does not have a car. Since he does not <br /> have a car, this limits his options and the area needs more bus hours and light rail. <br /> Travis Creighton echoed what had been said. He said that buses are not enough. He <br /> asked the Board to put this referendum on the ballot. <br /> Marty Mandell said that the heart of this issue is growth. She said that light rail in <br /> Orange County would not be improving the quality of life at this time. She would like Orange <br /> County to get better and not necessarily bigger. She is in favor of a green solution. She <br /> suggested a loan guarantee program for fuel-efficient cars. She also suggested a for-profit <br /> ride share program for commuters. She said that she does support the '/2-cent sales tax, but <br /> she hopes it will be used in the right manner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.