Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Efland Community to address their concerns, and then this comes back to the Board. He said <br /> this does not say that this won't come back to the Board, but it directs staff to meet with the <br /> community. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin suggested holding an informational meeting with the public at the <br /> Whitted building to allow Commissioners and staff to attend, in an effort to bridge the gap. He <br /> asked if this could be added to the motion. <br /> Commissioner McKee and Commissioner Price agreed to this. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier also suggested an amendment to the motion, stating that this <br /> would come back in May. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he could not accept this, as he is not sure that this allows <br /> adequate time for staff to address community concerns. He said this would set an artificial <br /> deadline. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said she would like to have a specific time frame. <br /> Commissioner McKee and Commissioner Price agreed to September. <br /> Chair Jacobs reviewed the amended motion to have a public information meeting to give <br /> the Efland community members an opportunity to: meet with staff and Commissioners to <br /> express concerns, and for staff to explain the proposals, to come back for the September Public <br /> Hearing. <br /> Michael Talbert said there are two options: 1.To close the existing public hearing or 2. <br /> Continue this public hearing until the September 2014 Public Hearing. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he will add this to the beginning of his motion. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said she is not sure about having a public information meeting <br /> that requires the Commissioners to have a quorum. <br /> Commissioner Price said this is just a public meeting and the Commissioners can <br /> attend, but quorum is not required. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Price to <br /> close the public hearing; hold a staff coordinated public information session; and to bring this <br /> item back to a meeting in September, 2014. (There was discussion of the possibility of no QPH <br /> in September and the public hearing would possibly be during a regular meeting.) <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> Commissioner Price suggested there be more than one meeting. <br /> 5. 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text <br /> Amendments - To review government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO to <br /> establish a zoning program commonly referred to as Agricultural Support Enterprises <br /> (ASE) outside of the Rural Buffer land use classification. <br /> Perdita Holtz reviewed the following PowerPoint slides: <br /> Agricultural Support Enterprises Outside of the Rural Buffer Land Use Classification <br /> Quarterly Public Hearing <br /> February 24, 2014 <br /> Item C.5 <br /> History & Purpose of Amendment <br /> • A work-in-progress since 2001 <br /> ➢ Need for Conditional Zoning construct was one of the "sticking points" <br /> ➢ We now have this type of zoning in the UDO <br />