Orange County NC Website
Commissioner Price said she voted against it last time, and her comments are the same. <br /> She questioned whether the public received notice of the meeting last year when this was on <br /> the agenda. <br /> Perdita Holtz said the notice went out for the November 2012 quarterly public hearing, <br /> and the notice contained an update on the information meeting held in November, which was <br /> attended by only ten residents. <br /> Commissioner Price said she would still like to see more discussion with the community. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said this reflects the comments of the small area plan. She said <br /> that was a big picture, and this is only a small section of the Efland area plan. She is fine with <br /> having community meetings. She said it is important to continue this to avoid waiting another <br /> year. She said things get more difficult the longer this goes on. She suggested continuing the <br /> public hearing with a set date. <br /> Perdita Holtz suggested this be continued to the May Quarterly Public Hearing. She <br /> said a public hearing out in the community has never been done before, and it would require a <br /> quorum of both the Board and the planning board. She said a public meeting can be held with <br /> staff in attendance. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said she was not trying to imply having a public hearing in the <br /> community, as this will not allow for question and answers with staff, which is what the <br /> community wants. She said this is called a public information session. <br /> Ben Lloyd said people really want a public information session. <br /> Chair Jacobs noted, in fairness to staff, that meetings were held at the Efland Ruritan <br /> and there were repeated attempts to recruit people from Efland. He said there were people <br /> from Efland who served diligently. He said this was the Efland Mebane small area plan. He <br /> said the conversation included plans to get Mebane involved to insure that it would not annex <br /> into Efland. He said if this is not a concern now, it is because Mebane has agreed not to do <br /> this. He said there were signs up, and there were meetings at the Efland Community Center, <br /> the Efland Ruritan Club and Efland Cheeks Elementary school. He feels it is a good idea for the <br /> community to meet with staff to ask questions about this, and then this can come back to the <br /> Board. He said there have been no attempts to exclude anyone. <br /> An unidentified resident asked when the meeting was held at the Ruritan Club. He <br /> asked if the details presented tonight were discussed at that meeting four years ago. <br /> Perdita Holtz said the details were discussed at the open house community meeting held <br /> in November of 2012 from 4 - 6 pm at the Efland Community Center, and 10 people came. <br /> Greg Andrews said if this was turned down last time, he would like to see what changes <br /> have been made since then. <br /> Chair Jacobs said staff does that in the documents, and this is included. <br /> Greg Andrews said it seems that at least two of the Board members recognize that there <br /> is not enough change to make a difference <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Price to turn <br /> this proposal down and send it back to staff for further review and community input before <br /> bringing it back. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said this cannot be turned down, as this is not voted on at this <br /> meeting. She asked if Commissioner McKee would like to turn it back to the staff. <br /> Commissioner McKee said it was turned back to staff a year ago. <br /> Commissioner Rich said she is fine with the description of the sidewalks because of the <br /> forward thinking that the sidewalk issue is not being dropped. She said she does not <br /> understand why this wouldn't just continue to be a public hearing to get more information. <br /> Commissioner Price said staff and the Commissioners would be able to have dialogue <br /> with the community. She said it would give more time for community input. <br /> Chair Jacobs said this may just be a difference of semantics. He said the motion is to <br /> defer further Board of Commissioner consideration until staff meets with the members of the <br />