Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2014 - 7b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 04-15-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-15-2014 - 7b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2014 10:53:54 AM
Creation date
4/11/2014 12:31:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7b
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-15-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> Like the funding for libraries or convenience centers, the service district tax is a way to offer a <br /> needed or desired service to a large group of residents without making the cost prohibitively <br /> expensive. <br /> 31. How many residents in Orange County contract for garbage service? <br /> This number is not known because private haulers are not required to report it and can be <br /> reluctant to reveal their proprietary business data. In the late 1990s, phone interviews by <br /> Orange County Public Works recorded about 5,000 reported private waste customers in the <br /> unincorporated area of the county Another informal phone survey about five years ago by the <br /> Solid Waste Department came to a similar number, but those were based on non-binding <br /> responses from the private haulers of a range and remain only estimates of use of private waste <br /> hauling services. <br /> 32. How will the cost of the opt-out service be kept at a reasonable fee? <br /> The cost of the opt-out or subscription service option would presumably be fully funded by the <br /> subscribers, regardless of the level of the fee. Unfortunately, if the cost becomes too expensive <br /> some subscribers may cancel their service and/or new residents may choose not to enroll. If <br /> this happens the service fee would continue to escalate in order to achieve necessary levels of <br /> funding to operate the program, and the number of subscribers would continue to decline. <br /> Alternatively, the Board could agree to supplement this program from the general fund when <br /> the service fee reached a certain level or the number subscribers become insufficient to sustain <br /> the recycling service. In that instance, municipal residents would then be subsidizing a rural <br /> service that they are not eligible to receive. <br /> 33. How long will it take to get ready for the opt-out subscription service? Will it cost more, less or <br /> about the same as the tax district?Sounds like more trouble <br /> The County Manager has previously indicated that at least six months would be required to <br /> establish the opt-out service option. Given the Board's December 2013 declaration of intent to <br /> establish a service district (among other Board solid waste/recycling related priorities that are <br /> consuming staff resources) no preparatory work has been performed with regard to an opt-out <br /> option. There is still some uncertainty with regard to some of the details of implementation of <br /> an opt-out type service that would have to be resolved by the Board through discussions with <br /> staff and the approval of an implementation plan and subscription fee schedule. <br /> Additionally,if quantities of recyclable material shift from the curbside program to the <br /> convenience centers due to the increasing cost of the opt-out(subscription)service,the impact <br /> on the centers could be substantial and additional resources will likely be necessary to collect <br /> and haul these additional materials. Staff has not conducted a detailed analysis of these <br /> additional costs. <br /> 34. Is there any other county that charges for convenience centers as well as for the cost of <br /> recycling <br /> Based upon a less than comprehensive research due to the large number of questions involved, <br /> and the limited timeframe in which to respond we have found that,according to NCDENR State <br /> records from County reporting on the annual report,the following communities appear to meet <br /> those criteria of charging for convenience centers and charging for recycling collection Caldwell <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.