Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2014 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 04-15-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-15-2014 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 11:55:13 AM
Creation date
4/11/2014 12:28:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-15-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> Mr. Gayle Wilson <br /> April 3, 2U/4 <br /> Page <br /> Triangle Grading&Paving, Inc.; and Rifenburg Construction Inc.)contained irregularities which consisted of <br /> t^Ume to include required information with the bid. The apparent )on bidder, T&){ C000Uruuhuo, LLC <br /> (T&K),had the lowest base bid and was lowest for both bid alternates. <br /> Required Contractor Qualifications <br /> BDD requested qualifications from the low responsive bidder, T6L}{. Attached is aunpy of the fiuuuuiu} and <br /> legal documents provided for review by HDR| and Orange County. BDRL`o review of dbcac Jucuuzcu10 <br /> generally found them to be responsive to the requirements contained in Section OOlOO, luooucLiouo to <br /> Bidders, of the Bid Documents. BDR also contacted professional references supplied by T8tK. The <br /> references contacted indicated T&K performed satisfactorily during their projects. <br /> Recommendations <br /> It is the opinion o[BDB, based on RDBL`o review of the hiJa and supplemental information submitted by <br /> T&l{, that T&K provided the lowest priced responsive hid. DDR finds that T6tK has the experience to <br /> complete this type of work and would be an acceptable contractor for the project. <br /> HDR recommends that the County award the contract to T&K Construction, LLC for the Base Bid amount of <br /> Three Million, Three Hundred Forty Thousand, Six Hundred Dollars($3°34O,600,00). [o addition tothe <br /> Base Bid amount, RDR o:uomnucndx that the County award the fh))ovviug Dud Cost Items to T&:){ <br /> Construction, LLC: <br /> Supply and Install LaudfiUGas System Extensions $59,052.00 <br /> Supply and Install Landfill Gas System Boots $26,790.00 <br /> Leucbate Collection System Cleaning and Videotaping $-5,7200L0O <br /> TOTAL UNIT COST ITEMS $91,542.00 <br /> The total construction contract would he for Three MUDno, Four Hundred Thirty Two Thousand, One <br /> Hundred Forty Dollars($3,432°142). <br /> In addition, HDR recommends that the County budget a contingency equal to a minimum of 10%of the Base <br /> Bid ($334,860) for the other )iou item work included in the bid that may become necessary due to <br /> uncertainties related to the availability or quality of on-site soils and other unforeseen conditions. <br /> HDR appreciates the opportunity to provide continued service to Orange County. Please feel free tucontact <br /> meo1(A|A)232-6682 should you have questions regarding this information. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> o 0z <br /> K80o&X Engineering Inc.o7the Carolinas <br /> SEX <br /> Thomas M. Yuuoauhuk' PB -- <br /> Project Engineer <br /> as <br /> Enclosures: Bid Tabulation Summary <br /> Supplemental Post-Bid Information Provided byT&K <br /> oon Engineering,Inc.o/the Carolinas <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.