Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
37 <br /> 1 Efland Community to address their concerns, and then this comes back to the Board. He said <br /> 2 this does not say that this won't come back to the Board, but it directs staff to meet with the <br /> 3 community. <br /> 4 Commissioner Dorosin suggested holding an informational meeting with the public at the <br /> 5 Whitted building to allow Commissioners and staff to attend, in an effort to bridge the gap. He <br /> 6 asked if this could be added to the motion. <br /> 7 Commissioner McKee and Commissioner Price agreed to this. <br /> 8 Commissioner Pelissier also suggested an amendment to the motion, stating that this <br /> 9 would come back in May. <br /> 10 Commissioner McKee said he could not accept this, as he is not sure that this allows <br /> 11 adequate time for staff to address community concerns. He said this would set an artificial <br /> 12 deadline. <br /> 13 Commissioner Pelissier said she would like to have a specific time frame. <br /> 14 Commissioner McKee and Commissioner Price agreed to September. <br /> 15 Chair Jacobs reviewed the amended motion to have a public information meeting to give <br /> 16 the Efland community members an opportunity to: meet with staff and Commissioners to <br /> 17 express concerns, and for staff to explain the proposals, to come back for the September Public <br /> 18 Hearing. <br /> 19 Michael Talbert said there are two options: 1.To close the existing public hearing or 2. <br /> 20 Continue this public hearing until the September 2014 Public Hearing. <br /> 21 Commissioner McKee said he will add this to the beginning of his motion. <br /> 22 Commissioner Gordon said she is not sure about having a public information meeting <br /> 23 that requires the Commissioners to have a quorum. <br /> 24 Commissioner Price said this is just a public meeting and the Commissioners can <br /> 25 attend, but quorum is not required. <br /> 26 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Price to <br /> 27 close the public hearing; hold a staff coordinated public information session; and to bring this <br /> 28 item back to a meeting in September, 2014. (There was discussion of the possibility of no QPH <br /> 29 in September and the public hearing would possibly be during a regular meeting.) <br /> 30 <br /> 31 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Commissioner Price suggested there be more than one meeting. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 5. 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text <br /> 36 Amendments - To review government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO to <br /> 37 establish a zoning program commonly referred to as Agricultural Support Enterprises <br /> 38 (ASE) outside of the Rural Buffer land use classification. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Perdita Holtz reviewed the following PowerPoint slides: <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Agricultural Support Enterprises Outside of the Rural Buffer Land Use Classification <br /> 43 Quarterly Public Hearing <br /> 44 February 24, 2014 <br /> 45 Item C.5 <br /> 46 <br /> 47 History & Purpose of Amendment <br /> 48 A work-in-progress since 2001 <br /> 49 ➢ Need for Conditional Zoning construct was one of the "sticking points" <br /> 50 ➢ We now have this type of zoning in the UDO <br />