Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 04-15-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-15-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2014 11:44:56 AM
Creation date
4/11/2014 11:43:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-15-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
36 <br /> 1 Commissioner Price said she voted against it last time, and her comments are the same. <br /> 2 She questioned whether the public received notice of the meeting last year when this was on <br /> 3 the agenda. <br /> 4 Perdita Holtz said the notice went out for the November 2012 quarterly public hearing, <br /> 5 and the notice contained an update on the information meeting held in November, which was <br /> 6 attended by only ten residents. <br /> 7 Commissioner Price said she would still like to see more discussion with the community. <br /> 8 Commissioner Pelissier said this reflects the comments of the small area plan. She said <br /> 9 that was a big picture, and this is only a small section of the Efland area plan. She is fine with <br /> 10 having community meetings. She said it is important to continue this to avoid waiting another <br /> 11 year. She said things get more difficult the longer this goes on. She suggested continuing the <br /> 12 public hearing with a set date. <br /> 13 Perdita Holtz suggested this be continued to the May Quarterly Public Hearing. She <br /> 14 said a public hearing out in the community has never been done before, and it would require a <br /> 15 quorum of both the Board and the planning board. She said a public meeting can be held with <br /> 16 staff in attendance. <br /> 17 Commissioner Pelissier said she was not trying to imply having a public hearing in the <br /> 18 community, as this will not allow for question and answers with staff, which is what the <br /> 19 community wants. She said this is called a public information session. <br /> 20 Ben Lloyd said people really want a public information session. <br /> 21 Chair Jacobs noted, in fairness to staff, that meetings were held at the Efland Ruritan <br /> 22 and there were repeated attempts to recruit people from Efland. He said there were people <br /> 23 from Efland who served diligently. He said this was the Efland Mebane small area plan. He <br /> 24 said the conversation included plans to get Mebane involved to insure that it would not annex <br /> 25 into Efland. He said if this is not a concern now, it is because Mebane has agreed not to do <br /> 26 this. He said there were signs up, and there were meetings at the Efland Community Center, <br /> 27 the Efland Ruritan Club and Efland Cheeks Elementary school. He feels it is a good idea for the <br /> 28 community to meet with staff to ask questions about this, and then this can come back to the <br /> 29 Board. He said there have been no attempts to exclude anyone. <br /> 30 An unidentified resident asked when the meeting was held at the Ruritan Club. He <br /> 31 asked if the details presented tonight were discussed at that meeting four years ago. <br /> 32 Perdita Holtz said the details were discussed at the open house community meeting held <br /> 33 in November of 2012 from 4 - 6 pm at the Efland Community Center, and 10 people came. <br /> 34 Greg Andrews said if this was turned down last time, he would like to see what changes <br /> 35 have been made since then. <br /> 36 Chair Jacobs said staff does that in the documents, and this is included. <br /> 37 Greg Andrews said it seems that at least two of the Board members recognize that there <br /> 38 is not enough change to make a difference <br /> 39 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Price to turn <br /> 40 this proposal down and send it back to staff for further review and community input before <br /> 41 bringing it back. <br /> 42 Commissioner Gordon said this cannot be turned down, as this is not voted on at this <br /> 43 meeting. She asked if Commissioner McKee would like to turn it back to the staff. <br /> 44 Commissioner McKee said it was turned back to staff a year ago. <br /> 45 Commissioner Rich said she is fine with the description of the sidewalks because of the <br /> 46 forward thinking that the sidewalk issue is not being dropped. She said she does not <br /> 47 understand why this wouldn't just continue to be a public hearing to get more information. <br /> 48 Commissioner Price said staff and the Commissioners would be able to have dialogue <br /> 49 with the community. She said it would give more time for community input. <br /> 50 Chair Jacobs said this may just be a difference of semantics. He said the motion is to <br /> 51 defer further Board of Commissioner consideration until staff meets with the members of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.