Orange County NC Website
29 <br /> Support legislation to explore and authorize use of alternate, sustainable revenue options or <br /> funding sources like licenses, taxes and/or fees for beach, inlet and waterway maintenance(as <br /> proposed via 2009 CRC and CRAC resolution for Trust Fund; Senate DRS 85164-SB-12 Beach <br /> Management Study Commission Section 2.2 (3) Trust Fund, 2012 Session H1181 Study <br /> Municipal Local Option Sales Tax, and 2004 Session H142 Dare County Sale Tax). <br /> TF-8: Replace current non-profit sales tax refund process with a revenue-neutral exemption. <br /> Support legislation to eliminate the requirement for tax-exempt non-profit corporations to pay <br /> sales tax. The current burdensome process, which requires the eligible non-profits to pay sales <br /> taxes and then seek a refund from the State has resulted in significant negative impacts upon <br /> county budgets. Sales tax revenues received by the local governments that include payments <br /> from tax-exempt corporations overstate the amount of funding actually available to the local <br /> government, and state audit adjustments result in unpredictable repayment obligations over <br /> which the local government has no control. <br /> TF-9: Replace current refund sales tax process for public institutions with a revenue-neutral <br /> exemption. <br /> Seek legislation that streamlines the sales tax refund regulatory process by exempting public <br /> institutions (counties, cities, school boards, community colleges, local utility authorities, etc.) <br /> from payment of state and local sales taxes on purchases within the state and thereby diminish <br /> the administrative burden on the local and state level to pursue/account for/recoup sales tax <br /> proceeds. <br /> TF-10: Extend Article 44 hold harmless. <br /> Seek legislation that extends hold harmless payments for local governments whose expected <br /> Article 44 receipts do not replace their repealed state reimbursements. The 2004 Appropriations <br /> Act(H1414) amended G.S. 105-521 by guaranteeing hold harmless payments through 2012 for <br /> local governments. The 2012-13 payment is scheduled to be the last unless additional legislation <br /> is passed. The Article 44 hold harmless payments are approximately $15 million, and these funds <br /> are an important source of revenue for the economically distressed counties and municipalities <br /> that receive them. <br /> TF-11:Allow counties to provide triple credit toward renewable energy portfolios. <br /> Support legislation similar to legislation passed in 2010 (Cleanfields of 20 10) to allow counties <br /> to provide triple credit toward renewable energy portfolios. <br /> TF-12:Authorize greater county oversight of legal electronic gaming operations and support <br /> legislation to authorize counties to levy privilege license taxes on these operations. <br /> Support legislation to authorize counties to levy privilege license taxes on internet sweepstakes <br /> businesses. Counties do not have the same authority as municipalities to levy a privilege license <br /> tax on video sweepstakes businesses, and this disparity may create an incentive for such <br /> businesses to locate in rural areas outside the corporate limits of municipalities. Seek legislation <br /> similar to Hl 180 from the 2011-12 session that would give counties and municipalities the same <br /> authority to levy privilege license taxes on internet sweepstakes businesses in order to discourage <br /> the proliferation of those businesses in rural areas outside corporate limits. <br />