Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
37 <br /> 163 Michael Brough: There is area there but the problem is that it will cost thousands of dollars to do it, As you have <br /> 164 already pointed out,you have got buildings well within the 150-foot setback. <br /> 165 <br /> 166 Buddy Hartley: If those are covered areas,they could be moved to the areas in black. <br /> 167 <br /> 168 Michael Brough: The fence is an issue and then we have the issue of why are we taking away 125 feet out of the <br /> 169 ability to use their property when the adjoining property owners do not object. <br /> 170 <br /> 171 Johnny Randall: The area of the existing fence that is on the property line,will that have to be moved anyway? <br /> 172 <br /> 173 Michael Harvey: The Easterlins' will have to move the fence 25 feet or purchase additional property so the fence <br /> 174 complies with the setback. <br /> 175 <br /> 176 Buddy Hartley: Either way it will be expensive. <br /> 177 <br /> 178 Tony Blake: Have the Economic Development folks weighed in on this. <br /> 179 <br /> 180 Michael Harvey: No. <br /> 181 <br /> 182 Tony Blake: There should be a way to tweak things that are special cases without affecting every EDD(2) parcel in <br /> 183 the County. It seems this is not unreasonable in this instance. I don't see the benefit in enforcing this or putting this <br /> 184 type of burden on a small business. <br /> 185 <br /> 186 Craig Benedict: In my comments, this is not about looking at one property. I am not specifically talking about this <br /> 187 use that is here but the long-term guidelines. We are not looking at someone's site plan when we are addressing <br /> 188 changing a zoning district that we should not even looking at. I am representing EDD(2)zoning everywhere. <br /> 189 <br /> 190 Paul Guthrie: If the owners were to abandon the use and leave it there and not use it for anything,would you have to <br /> 191 tear the fence down? <br /> 192 <br /> 193 Michael Harvey: If the area wasn't used as an exercise yard,then there would be no 150-foot setback. <br /> 194 <br /> 195 Paul Guthrie: There would be no need to tear down that fence and move it? <br /> 196 <br /> 197 Michael Harvey:That assumes that it is no longer utilized for the purpose that the Easterlins'want to use it. <br /> 198 <br /> 199 Paul Guthrie: If they only had to erect a fenced area inside the black box that was sufficient to give the exercise they <br /> 200 want to give,would that change the financial impact? <br /> 201 <br /> 202 Michael Brough: Even if you left the fence there you would have to re-fence another area. You are saying acres of <br /> 203 property and leaving it unusable. It would be cheaper to leave the fence there and not use that part of the property at <br /> 204 all and erect a new fence somewhere else on the property. <br /> 205 <br /> 206 Mrs. Easterlin: The blue line around the outside, there are also several fenced in yards inside the area so we have <br /> 207 about nine yards. <br /> 208 <br /> 209 Tony Blake: The way the amendments read there would need to be someone out there with them. <br /> 210 <br /> 211 Michael Harvey: I have never seen a situation where the dogs were out there overnight. <br /> 212 <br /> 213 Lisa Stuckey: We can't make them put them in. <br /> 214 <br /> 4 <br />