Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Attachment 6 26 <br /> Excerpt of Draft Minutes <br /> 1 DRAFT <br /> 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> 4 QUARTERLY PUBLIC HEARING <br /> 5 February 24, 2014 <br /> 6 7:00 P.M. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 The Orange County Board of Commissioners and the Orange County Planning Board <br /> 9 met for a dinner meeting on Monday, February 24, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. at the DSS Officers, <br /> 10 Hillsborough, N.C. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Barry Jacobs and Commissioners Mark <br /> 13 Dorosin, Alice M. Gordon, Earl McKee Bernadette Pelissier, Renee Price and Penny Rich <br /> 14 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: <br /> 15 COUNTY ATTORNEY PRESENT: James Bryan (Staff Attorney) <br /> 16 COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: Interim County Manager Michael Talbert and Deputy Clerk to the <br /> 17 Board David Hunt (All other staff members will be identified appropriately below) <br /> 18 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Planning Board members Maxecine Mitchell, <br /> 19 Johnny Randall, Paul Guthrie, Herman Staats, Tony Blake, and H.T. "Buddy" Hartley <br /> 20 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Pete Hallenbeck, Lisa Stuckey, Stephanie <br /> 21 O'Rourke, Andrea Rohrbacher and James Lea <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Chair Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. He reviewed the following items at <br /> 24 the members' places: <br /> 25 - Booklet/Blue Sheets/Cream Sheets/PowerPoint— Item C-1 —Class A Special Use <br /> 26 Permit <br /> 27 - Letter— Item C-3 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment <br /> 28 <br /> 29 A. OPENING REMARKS FROM THE CHAIRS <br /> 30 <br /> 31 B. PUBLIC CHARGE <br /> 32 The Chair dispensed with the reading of the public charge. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS <br /> 35 Planning Board Member Buddy Hartley introduced this item. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 3. Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment- To review an application <br /> 38 seeking to amend Section 5.6.5 (A) (2) (b) Kennels (Class ll) —Standards of Evaluation <br /> 39 to reduce required setbacks for Class II Kennels developed within the EDE-2 zoning <br /> 40 district. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Michael Harvey said there is no formal presentation for this item. He referred to a <br /> 43 display of the text markup. He referred to page 65 of the abstract and the proposed text <br /> 44 amendment on Attachment 1. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 He said this is referring to a Class 2 kennel, which involves the keeping, boarding, care, <br /> 47 and training of more than 20 animals. He said the current requirement is a 150 foot setback <br /> 48 from all established property lines. He said the applicant is currently operating under an existing <br /> 49 Class 2 kennel permit, issued in 1986. He said the applicant has dog run areas within the <br /> 50 required setbacks, and the proposed text amendment would drop the required setback to 25 <br />