Orange County NC Website
Bret Martin said he would agree that the language is not clear. He said the way he <br /> reads it is that, "a quorum of the MPO Board shall consist of a majority of the voting members <br /> whose votes together represent a majority of the possible weighted votes identified in the <br /> weighted vote schedule below." He said the sentence is being modified in such a way that <br /> what really matters is the weighted votes; but it is true that if only Durham and Durham County <br /> are there, a quorum would exist. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said one way to fix it is to make it specific that the quorum is 6 <br /> people and those 6 people need to represent the weighted vote. <br /> Commissioner Price said her concern is the representation. She said she would like to <br /> see some language indicating the need to have more than two governments present. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if each of the boards is voting on the same language. <br /> Bret Martin said yes. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if any of the other boards have voted on this yet. <br /> Bret Martin said the Town of Hillsborough has approved it, and Chatham County has <br /> denied it. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if this language will have to go back to all of the other boards <br /> if it is changed. <br /> Bret Martin said yes. He said there is a moderate chance that this will have to go back <br /> anyway, after the other governing bodies review it. <br /> Chair Jacobs suggested the delegates bring it back to their MPO meeting and share <br /> the Board of County Commissioners' concerns. He suggested the delegates recommend <br /> changes to go back to all of the other boards again for review and approval. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said she talked with Ellen Beckmen, a member of MPO staff, <br /> today. She said this item is out for discussion, and Chatham County has denied it. She <br /> suggested that the wording she specified above should be added. <br /> Commissioner Gordon also reviewed the technical items outlined in the memo below: <br /> 6-i - DCHC MPO Revisions to MOU <br /> There are minor edits that I would suggest for clarity. What would be the best way to handle <br /> these edits, if the BOCC chose to incorporate them? I will refer to Attachment 5, since this is <br /> the draft with line numbers. <br /> Page 1 of MOU (p. 31 of the BOCC agenda) - Line 42 <br /> Spell out TIP so that the line reads: <br /> ...and Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs). It is customary to spell out the full name <br /> before using an abbreviation. <br /> Page 2 of MOU (p. 32 of agenda) - Line 17 <br /> Spell out MPO so that it reads: <br /> Each Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)... <br /> Page 3 of MOU (p. 33 of agenda) - Line 39 <br /> Add "policy" before "boards" so that it reads: <br /> ...include the policy boards of general purpose local government... <br /> The reason for this change is to clarify the reference to "policy boards" in paragraph 9 of the <br /> MOU (Line 32 on p. 4 of the MOU and p. 34 of the agenda.) <br />