Orange County NC Website
A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Rich to <br /> approve the remaining items on the consent agenda. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> • Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda <br /> 6-h McGowan Creek Sewer Interceptor Project—Acceptance of State Revolving Fund <br /> Loan <br /> The Board considered approving and authorizing the Chair to sign the Resolution of <br /> Acceptance for the State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan for this project; and authorizing the <br /> Manager to sign the State Loan Offer and Acceptance letter on behalf of the Board of County <br /> Commissioners. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Mike Efland said he is a property owner on McGowan Creek. He said the sewer project <br /> has passed over this property once and will now pass over a second time. He is not opposed <br /> to the sewer line itself. He said the newest line is for the pump station is only to decommission <br /> a pump station on Cedar Grove Road, and it is not going to serve anyone but the pump <br /> station. He asked about the cost of putting the line in versus updating the pump station. He <br /> feels this whole process allows for no negotiation, because the land can be condemned if <br /> property owners don't allow easements. He said there should be a negotiation process when <br /> owners are asked to allow an easement. <br /> He said there was some discussion long ago about a green path through the property, <br /> and he placed his home right on the setback of the floodplain. He said this sewage line will <br /> come between his home and the flood plain. He said the County has only offered him $800, <br /> and he feels his rights have been violated. He said privacy is very important to him, and he <br /> paid taxes and bought the property. He said now there are trees being cut down, and there <br /> will be a big path beside his house. He said he wants something in writing to make sure this <br /> path does not become a greenway in the future. He does not feel he should have a tax <br /> increase on his property because he has access to the sewer when he does not need it. <br /> Mike Efland suggested a fence and a gate if the County needs to access this line for <br /> maintenance. He does not want the public using the path on his property as a public access to <br /> the creek. He wants something to protect his property, and he wants something in writing. <br /> He said he feels he has been railroaded and he has tried to negotiate, but it has fallen <br /> on deaf ears. <br /> Chair Jacobs asked Michael Talbert how this should proceed. <br /> Michael Talbert said this does not affect the revolving loan. He said the line has been <br /> approved and contracted, and this is just final approval of the loan package that helps pay for <br /> it. <br /> John Roberts said this will depend on how strongly the state will enforce its <br /> assurances. He said the County is required to make sure all easements are acquired. <br /> Chair Jacobs confirmed that as of now, Mr. Efland has not signed an agreement. <br /> John Roberts said this is correct. He said there has been a notification of intent to <br /> condemn. He noted that the condemnation process does not take the land, only the easement <br /> or right of way, and the land remains with the land owner. He said a notice of a condemnation <br /> of an easement has been sent, and this should satisfy state requirements. <br />