Browse
Search
Minutes 01-23-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 01-23-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2014 12:52:05 PM
Creation date
4/2/2014 12:48:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/23/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6j
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6k
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6l
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 6m
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 7b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 7c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014 - 7d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014-11a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014-11b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014-11c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014-13 (1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014-13 (2)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014-13 (3)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014-13 (4)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 01-23-2014-13 (5)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-23-2014 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2014-001 Ordinance Amending the Unified Development Ordinance of Orange County incorporating State Law related changes to the Board of Adjustment
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
ORD-2014-002 Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment Related to Telecommunication Facilities
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
ORD-2014-003 Ordinance approving Budget Amendment #4 for Fiscal Year 2013-14
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
ORD-2014-004 Ordinance approving Budget Amendment #4-A for Fiscal Year 2013-14 – Approval of a 0.50 FTE Increase and a General Fund Intrafund Transfer to Establish a 1.0 FTE Agricultural Economic Development Coordinator
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
ORD-2014-005 Ordinance approving Budget Amendment #4-B for Fiscal Year 2013-14 to purchase Rural Curbside Recycling Trucks
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2014
RES-2014-001 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2014
RES-2014-003 Resolution approving Applications for Property Tax Exemption/Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2014
RES-2014-004 Resolution Accepting State Revolving Fund Loan - McGowan Creek Sewer Interceptor Project
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
John Roberts said yes. He said the municipalities would have to approve being <br /> included in the service district. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> Norma White lives in Little River Township, and she is against a tax service district. <br /> She said the Board of Commissioners exists for the cause of the common good and general <br /> welfare of the people. She said everyone can agree that schools, libraries and many County <br /> services exist for the common good and general County welfare, even if these are located in <br /> town and far from rural households. She said everyone pays, and no one gets to pick and <br /> choose what the common good is. She said everyone agrees that solid waste/recycling is an <br /> issue that is for the common good of the County, but it is not true that everyone pays. She <br /> said the Board of County Commissioners is turning this upside down. She said data shows <br /> that the rural areas are doing a fantastic job of recycling, and these areas have been telling the <br /> County for years that rural people do recycling differently. She said these residents use the <br /> SWCC for the common good, yet the rural people pay more. She said this discrepancy shoots <br /> down the common good concept. She said the tax differential has all of the appearances of <br /> an implicit special tax district, with unequal application of taxation to the rural areas and <br /> exclusion of the urban areas. She said the County now wants to impose another tax applied <br /> only to the rural areas. She said the County's pretense that the rural areas need and will <br /> overwhelmingly use curbside recycling is a faulty premise, as these areas have never been <br /> polled or surveyed. She said this is a stab in the dark, and the issue is a shortfall of money in <br /> the Solid Waste Department. <br /> David Laudocina lives in Bingham Township, and he urged the Board to find an <br /> equitable solution for curbside recycling rather than implementing a district tax based on <br /> property valuation. He believes progressive taxation is appropriate for some services, but <br /> curbside rural recycling is not a good fit. He said his property tax bill includes a flat rate for the <br /> 3-r fee and a flat rate for the waste center fee, and these charges are dependent on where you <br /> live in the County. He feels that the flat rate system for curbside is more consistent with the <br /> method used for other waste services. He said the magnitude of the difference in total dollars <br /> paid between properties using a district tax tied to property valuation grows as the tax rate <br /> increases over time. He said he hopes the policy of allowing use of the orange bins for rural <br /> recycling will be a reality, regardless of what system is implemented. <br /> He noted that property values have not been re-valued since 2009 to provide true <br /> property tax assessments. He said the Board has done a good job of holding the line on <br /> property tax increases. He believes it is prudent for the County to find a fairer, more equitable <br /> way to pay for rural curbside recycling and hold off on any property tax increases until the <br /> valuations are fair and balanced. <br /> Alex Castro said he is a senior resident of Bingham Township, and it seemed to him <br /> that the Board is messing with something that is working. He said recycling is working in <br /> Orange County, and now the Board is looking to spend a lot of money for changes that don't <br /> fit. He said that people given a choice will not opt-in; therefore if residents are not forced to do <br /> it, the population will not exist to sustain what is put in place. He asked the Board to think <br /> strongly about whether this is a good avenue. <br /> Bonnie Hauser said she lives in rural Orange County. She uses the SWCC for trash <br /> and recycling, and she composts at home. She said families in the unincorporated areas <br /> overwhelmingly prefer a voluntary fee over a service district tax. She said % of the families in <br /> the rural community prefer to use the convenience centers for trash, and they bring their <br /> recycling too. She said this is not about recycling rates, it is simply about the fact that curbside <br /> services don't work in much of the rural area. She said people should be able to opt out if they <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.