Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 04-01-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-01-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2014 9:02:02 AM
Creation date
3/31/2014 9:01:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-01-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> 1 Commissioner McKee said he is assuming the reduction at the state and federal levels <br /> 2 was not expected. <br /> 3 John Tallmadge said that is correct. <br /> 4 Commissioner McKee said what makes him uneasy is that the projected growth rate in <br /> 5 sales tax revenue has increased by almost 25 percent. He asked how he can feel confident <br /> 6 that this is concrete when past projections on federal and state percentage have been thrown <br /> 7 out the window with massive reductions. <br /> 8 John Tallmadge said there are different forces acting on these current assumptions. He <br /> 9 said one is political policy and the other is economic. He said when the assumptions were <br /> 10 being worked on in 2011, it was during a deep recession, and there had been negative returns <br /> 11 in sales tax. He said this meant it was a very conservative budgeting time. He said the values <br /> 12 then still recognized that the longer term growth rate would be different than the first couple of <br /> 13 years. He said this new growth rate is consistent with long term growth rates in Orange County <br /> 14 in the last decades. He said more time can be spent on the analysis when this is brought to the <br /> 15 Board for a decision. <br /> 16 Michael Talbert said he would second what John Tallmadge said. He said these original <br /> 17 estimates were done coming out of the great recession. He said Clarence Grier has reviewed <br /> 18 these, and he feels these numbers are very realistic. He referred to the yellow sheet, and said <br /> 19 the revenue estimates are increasing by more than 5 percent, which should provide an <br /> 20 opportunity for the Board to approve a change in the plan. <br /> 21 Michael Talbert referred to attachment 1-e and 1-f and noted that the grand totals after <br /> 22 2035 increase by $100 million. He said a large percentage of that increase is the removal of <br /> 23 federal and state money and the issuing of bonds. He said there is an issuance of$126 million <br /> 24 in bonds and debt in 2012 that was not part of the original plan. He said much of the gap is <br /> 25 being filled with bonds. <br /> 26 Commissioner Price asked how the projected growth rate of the sales tax translates with <br /> 27 regard to the buses and hours for the Hillsborough and northern Orange bus routes and park <br /> 28 and ride. She asked for clarification on whether the earlier discussion was about buses on 1-85 <br /> 29 or Highway 70. <br /> 30 David King said he specifically said the 1-85 corridor, but Highway 70 is also included. <br /> 31 Commissioner Price asked how this change in the funding formula affects the timeline <br /> 32 for getting buses in the northern part of the County. <br /> 33 John Tallmadge said the goal was for the financial plan not to be the driver. He said the <br /> 34 dollars will be there. He said this will depend on when the planning is done, when the park and <br /> 35 ride lots are leased or built, and when the vehicles are available for the service. He is hopeful <br /> 36 that this can start at the end of this calendar year. <br /> 37 Commissioner Price noted a reference to DR Commuter Rail, and she asked for an <br /> 38 explanation of this. <br /> 39 John Tallmadge said this is the Durham Raleigh Commuter Rail, and this is part of the <br /> 40 Durham plan. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Commissioner McKee referred to the operating costs per revenue hour listed on page 6. <br /> 43 He asked if Triangle Transit's cost increase of 11 percent is projected to be a continuous <br /> 44 increase at this rate, or if it is an anomaly. <br /> 45 John Tallmadge said an adjustment was made to the fiscal year 2013 actual values and <br /> 46 everyone is then inflated on a 3.1 percent rate. He said this is a recalibration and then in the <br /> 47 model, each future year grows 3.1 percent. He said these values are used to generate how <br /> 48 much service will cost, and then this backfills once a determination is made of how much local <br /> 49 money is needed to provide service. He said the set split agreement between Chapel Hill, TT, <br /> 50 OPT and Orange County means there is no advantage to an agency inflating its cost per hour. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.