Orange County NC Website
19 <br /> 1 Commissioner Gordon asked how these other options will be articulated. She <br /> 2 suggested this could be brought back by staff. She questioned what options would be put back <br /> 3 on the table. She said some options, such as franchises, have been eliminated by the Board, <br /> 4 and she questioned how it would affect the interactions with the towns if these things were <br /> 5 added back. She said the reintroduction of some of these options may have unintended <br /> 6 consequences. <br /> 7 Gayle Wilson said some of the topics include: the general fund option; Solid Waste <br /> 8 Convenience Center-only option; district tax; and a subscription service. <br /> 9 Michael Talbert said the County has already made a commitment to the towns saying <br /> 10 that the urban curbside is moving forward, and some of these other options are in conflict and <br /> 11 may have unintended consequences. He asked if the Board wants everything on the table at <br /> 12 the public hearing, or if the general fund idea should be eliminated. He said this means the <br /> 13 town residents would have to pay a tax to support the rural district, and this would be a problem <br /> 14 with intergovernmental relations. <br /> 15 Chair Jacobs said he has suggested that staff can vet the universe of options and come <br /> 16 back with a statement on February 4th. He said this would allow the Board to review it and <br /> 17 make an informed recommendation. <br /> 18 Commissioner Dorosin said he disagrees with the idea that the two goals are in conflict. <br /> 19 He said he feels that it is possible to have both environmental protection and social justice. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to <br /> 22 move forward with: <br /> 23 <br /> 24 1. Discussing potential public hearing(s) on the proposed District establishment and other <br /> 25 options to be articulated, if inclined; determining the number and locations of public hearing(s) <br /> 26 the Board would like staff to pursue scheduling, including whether the public hearings should be <br /> 27 separate meetings or occur as part of regular Board meetings. (Note— Based on statutory <br /> 28 requirements and time constraints associated with a July 1, 2014 implementation, staff <br /> 29 believes public hearing(s) will need to occur in late March and early April). <br /> 30 2. Pending outcomes from #1 above, directing staff to bring back proposed public hearing <br /> 31 dates, times, and locations to the February 4, 2014 regular Board meeting for approval. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Michael Talbert summarized the above motion. He asked for clarification on whether <br /> 36 these hearings will be held at regular Board meetings or at separate meetings. He also clarified <br /> 37 that the Board does not want staff to move forward with the criteria to establish a district, but <br /> 38 that that process should stop at the fact that a district is possible, as well as the other three <br /> 39 options. He asked that the clerk poll the Board for relative dates to possibly do two additional <br /> 40 meetings. <br /> 41 Commissioner Gordon said she thought it was articulated that staff should vet the four <br /> 42 options, but possibly not bring back all four of them. <br /> 43 Michael Talbert said the four options outlined by Gayle Wilson are what will be brought <br /> 44 back with advantages and disadvantages, on February 4th, so that the Board can consider <br /> 45 whether these should be included in a public hearing. <br /> 46 Commissioner Gordon said she just wanted this to be clear to the towns. <br /> 47 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to <br /> 48 hold two public hearings as stand-alone events; to review the options brought forward; and to <br /> 49 receive public comment. <br />