Orange County NC Website
13 <br /> 1 hearing; and ultimately a final decision by the Board. He said these steps must all be taken in a <br /> 2 deliberate and timely manner if the Board wishes that the district be established and effective <br /> 3 by July 1, 2014. <br /> 4 He reviewed a map of the district, which was compiled to include the original 13,750 <br /> 5 residents that are currently eligible for the service and previously paid the 3-r fee. He said <br /> 6 additional parcels have been added to comply with the requirement in the statute that the <br /> 7 parcels that comprise the district be contiguous. He said additional parcels that contain more <br /> 8 densely populated areas, suitable for expansion, have also been included. He said the district <br /> 9 also includes parcels and roadways that link these denser areas to the existing service area to <br /> 10 create functional collection routes. <br /> 11 Gayle Wilson said the district includes sufficient service points to allow for maximizing <br /> 12 the efficiency of existing staff and equipment to allow for the addition of approximately 2,000 <br /> 13 additional service points. He said the proposed district contains about 8,000 additional parcels <br /> 14 from the existing service area. He said the current area was converted to single stream <br /> 15 collection last year, and efficiency was gained in this transition. He said this efficiency will be <br /> 16 further enhanced by new collection vehicles and roll carts. <br /> 17 He said 1,715 tons were collected from the existing service area last fiscal year. <br /> 18 He said phase 1 of the implementation plan consists of cart distribution and initiation of <br /> 19 service to the existing service area by November of 2014. He said phase 2 would be to <br /> 20 distribute carts and provide service to the newly added areas no later than the fall of 2015. <br /> 21 Gayle Wilson said the preliminary cost estimates for the district are $630,000 or 1.5 <br /> 22 cents per $100 of property value. He reviewed the manager recommendations outlined in the <br /> 23 abstract. <br /> 24 Michael Talbert reminded the Board of the past meetings leading to the consideration of <br /> 25 district, while using solid waste fund reserve balances for the current fiscal year. He said there <br /> 26 are many ways to pay for this, including: franchise, general fund taxing authority, or contracting <br /> 27 with a third party to provide a similar service. <br /> 28 Commissioner Gordon asked that the district be shown on a map of the entire County. <br /> 29 She referred to pages 10 and 11 and said it should be clear that this is a recycling service. <br /> 30 Michael Talbert said the district is primarily for the purpose of recycling, but the statute <br /> 31 authorizes a Solid Waste Service district, so it needs to be called that. He said recyclable <br /> 32 material is solid waste that has been removed from the solid waste stream for recycling <br /> 33 purposes. <br /> 34 Commissioner Price asked about the solid waste that is not recycled. <br /> 35 Gayle Wilson said nothing is being proposed related to garbage as a part of this district <br /> 36 at this time. <br /> 37 Commissioner Price asked about the reference on page 2 to services provided to the <br /> 38 elderly or disabled. <br /> 39 Gayle Wilson said special service is provided for bin pickup for elderly or disabled <br /> 40 residents unable to take it to the curb. <br /> 41 Commissioner Dorosin said the summary gave a projected tax rate of 1.5 cents per <br /> 42 $100 of property value. He asked if there has been any analysis of the values of the property in <br /> 43 the proposed district to arrive at that number. <br /> 44 Gayle Wilson said yes, this analysis was done. He noted that the total valuation of the <br /> 45 district is shown at the bottom of the map, and this number is $4,452,893,165. <br /> 46 Commissioner Dorosin asked Michael Talbert, if the Board wanted to fund this out of <br /> 47 their general fund, what $630,000 would mean in taxable value for the whole county. <br /> 48 Michael Talbert said this would equal .3 cent (1/3 of a penny). <br /> 49 Commissioner Dorosin noted that the report shows the 2011-12 program cost was <br /> 50 $506,000 for the program, and now the projected cost would be $630,000. <br />