Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-2014 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 04-01-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-01-2014 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 11:49:23 AM
Creation date
3/31/2014 8:59:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-01-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br /> services, induding integration of the public education and outreach function,was cost <br /> competitive with proposals received from the private sector. The county maintains a <br /> considerable economy of scale with its county-wide compliment of services and programs. <br /> 47. What are the costs of opening the five convenience centers 7 days/week? <br /> A brief evaluation of the cost to extend the hours of convenience centers to seven days/week <br /> has resulted in an estimated cost of$400,000 to$440,000 per year increase over current <br /> operating costs. Amore thorough and detailed analysis should be conducted to develop budget <br /> level cost estimates. The above estimate assumes 362 days per year operation,from 7am to <br /> 6pm. It should be noted that the convenience centers have never been open seven daysiweek <br /> since their creation in the early 1090's. They have always been dosed on Wednesdays for <br /> employee training and site maintenance purposes. <br /> There are a number of issues and assumptions that would have to be tested to confirm any cost <br /> proposal, including garbage/trash service and storage capacity given our dependence on distant <br /> waste transfer station disposal. Currently,with the available transfer station operations dosing <br /> at noon on Saturday until Monday,the waste collected at the centers Saturday afternoon and <br /> Sunday afternoon must be stored until Monday disposal. Our storage capacity used is typically <br /> at a maximum until we can dispose of the waste Monday morning. Opening Sunday morning <br /> would require additional storage capacity that has not been incorporated into the above <br /> estimates. There are certainly other, less extensive schedule of operation expansions that <br /> could be considered. Staff would suggest a comprehensive analysis of such a major expansion of <br /> hours at convenience centers prior to any serious discussion of such a decision. <br /> It should also be noted that previous Board of Commissioners' have made a commitment to a <br /> concept of Neighborhood/District Convenience Centers. This concept presumes that the District <br /> centers would have more expansive hours of operation and that Neighborhood Centers would <br /> have less expansive hours of operation. Part of the basis for this concept was to balance hours <br /> of operation with level of use, resulting in a less costly program; a balance of cost with <br /> convenience. <br /> 48. What reason does the county have to believe that the 1,650"new" households being added to <br /> the taxdistrict (those which have not been included in curbside recycling to date)intend to use <br /> the service if provided? What reason isthereto believe that adding these householdswill <br /> increase the total amount of recycling in the county,given that the program already has 55-60% <br /> participation levels? <br /> The majority of the residences included in the proposed expansion area of the district beyond <br /> the current service area include more dense neighborhoods that were identified in field surveys <br /> conducted 2-3 years ago for the purpose of identifying priority areasfor program expansion. <br /> For some of these areaswe have received resident requests or inquirieswith regard to <br /> expanding services. We feel confident that the proposed expansion areaswill meet or exceed <br /> the 57%participation rate of the existing area. There are some less dense areas also included <br /> either due to statutory contiguity requirements for service districts or as a result of routing <br /> connectivity reasons. It is our expectation, based on similar areas currently serviced,that we <br /> can expect participation rates at or beyond the current program-wide average 57%rate. <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.