Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Commissioner Gordon said she would like for the planning board to think about adding <br /> standards for traffic impacts. She said the building trades have the potential to have large <br /> impacts, and she would like for this to be addressed. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> b. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Strategic Action Plan — Continuation of Public <br /> Hearing to April 15, 2014 <br /> The Board continued the public hearing on the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Strategic <br /> Action Plan required for implementing a Safe Routes to School program in Orange County to <br /> April 15, 2014. <br /> Abigaile Pittman said they would like to extend the public hearing in order to receive <br /> more comments. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Dorosin, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to <br /> open the public hearing, and continue the hearing by adjourning it to April 15, 2014. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 6. Consent Agenda <br /> Removal of Any Items from Consent Agenda <br /> - Item 6-g was removed for discussion <br /> • Approval of Remaining Consent Agenda <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Pelissier, seconded by Commissioner Rich to <br /> approve the remaining items on the consent agenda. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> • Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda <br /> - 6-g. Commemorative Plaque Policy <br /> The Board considered the adoption of the recommended commemorative plaque policy for <br /> County facilities <br /> Jeff Thompson showed the Board four pictures of simulated plaques. He said he <br /> chose a facility built in the past in order to show plaques with past and present seated Board of <br /> County Commissioners, as well as the manager, at approval and completion. He noted the <br /> second example replaces the newly approved logo with the County seal. He noted the third <br /> and fourth examples list only those Commissioners serving at the time of completion. <br /> Commissioner Gordon gave a hand out to the Commissioners. She said she had taken <br /> the plaque outside the door of the meeting facility they were meeting in tonight and revised it <br /> to show what would be included on a plaque if the Board adopted what she has proposed in <br /> the policy. She suggested the Board should decide what they want included on the plaques <br /> and then ask staff to come back with a design. She suggested that the design issues should <br /> not be decided tonight. <br /> She reviewed the following email, which described a proposed revision to the policy. <br /> The Board discussed the policy, including an additional question with regard to <br /> potential changes to section 2.a.i. <br />