Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-18-2014 - 6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 03-18-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-18-2014 - 6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 11:37:23 AM
Creation date
3/14/2014 11:33:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/18/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6d
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-18-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />(32) High School <br />OCS total increase from the previous year: 199 students <br />30 Elementary School <br />63 Middle School <br />106 High School <br />( ) denotes decrease <br />4. Capacity Data <br />Capacity for Chapel Hill /Carrboro City Schools was increased by 585 students as a result <br />of the opening of Northside Elementary School. There were no changes to school <br />capacities this year for Orange County Schools. <br />5. Capacity Issues <br />SAPFO vs. DPI <br />The SAPFO is a local ordinance, independent of State Department of Public Instruction <br />(DPI) projections and rules regarding class size. The SAPFO, for instance, does not <br />count temporary modular classrooms as fulfilling the capacity level of service outlined in <br />the SAPFO interlocal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The MOU requires `bricks <br />and mortar' instead of temporary facilities and also requires its own set of future student <br />projections to identify long -term capital school construction needs. However, the County <br />did phase in the smaller class size in previous years that decreased capacity. Decisions <br />will have to be made if new discussions at the state level create any class size changes <br />that should or shouldn't be reflected in the County's SAPFO. <br />This year, CHCCS does not exceed the adopted levels of service established in the <br />SAPFO. Projections do show potential needs at the elementary, middle, and high school <br />levels within the 10 -year planning period. Projected needs are noted below. <br />Additionally, OCS does not exceed the adopted levels of service established in the <br />SAPFO at this time nor do projections show potential needs at the middle school level <br />within the 10 -year planning period. However, projections do show a potential need at the <br />elementary and high school level within the 10 -year planning period. Projected needs are <br />noted below. <br />6. Student Projection Analysis <br />Student membership projections show an increase at all levels in both school systems, <br />except for a small projected decrease in 2014 -15 at the high school level for OCS. The <br />projections are shown on pages 37 -38 of the report. <br />7. Orange County Schoi <br />CHCCS <br />Projected needs: <br />New Elementary #12 <br />New Middle School #5 <br />High School <br />As Systems; CIP Needs Analysis <br />2020 -2021 (projected overage of 45 students; 105.8% LOS <br />2020 -2021 (projected overage of 39 students; 108.3% LOS <br />2023 -2024 (projected overage of 6 students; 110.1% LOS) <br />OCS <br />Projected needs: <br />New Elementary # 8 2023 -2024 (projected overage of 28 students; 105.7% LOS) <br />Middle School projections show no needs in the next 10 years <br />High School 2022 -23 (projected overage of 59 students; 112.4% LOS) <br />The SAPFOTAC report notes that there are a significant number of approved, but <br />undeveloped lots within the portion of the City of Mebane that lies within Orange County. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.