Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />13 <br />Removal of Any Items from Consent Agenda <br />- Item 6 -g was removed for discussion <br />• Approval of Remaining Consent Agenda <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Pelissier, seconded by Commissioner Rich to <br />approve the remaining items on the consent agenda. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />• Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda <br />- 6 -g. Approval of Contract to Purchase Real Property — Triangle Land Conservancy <br />Jeff Thompson showed the Board four pictures of simulated plaques. He said he chose <br />a facility built in the past in order to show plaques with past and present seated Board of County <br />Commissioners, as well as the manager, at approval and completion. He noted the second <br />example replaces the newly approved logo with the County seal. He noted the third and fourth <br />examples list only those Commissioners serving at the time of completion. <br />Commissioner Gordon gave a hand out to the Commissioners. She said she had taken <br />the plaque outside the door of the meeting facility they were meeting in tonight and revised it to <br />show what would be included on a plaque if the Board adopted what she has proposed in the <br />policy. She suggested the Board should decide what they want included on the plaques and <br />then ask staff to come back with a design. She suggested that the design issues should not be <br />decided tonight. <br />She reviewed the following email, which described a proposed revision to the policy. <br />The Board discussed the policy, including an additional question with regard to potential <br />changes to section 2.a.i. <br />0 <br />Here is a proposed revision to the Commemorative Plaque Policy that I am suggesting for <br />consideration tonight. I did discuss the changes with the Manager to make sure they were <br />technically correct. The changes from the version in the agenda packet include the following: <br />In section 2 -a -ii - To the list of characteristics included on the plaque are added the date and <br />the names of any former Commissioners in office at the time the project was approved. <br />Deleted is the reference to unveiling, since staff said that was acceptable. <br />In sections 2 -b -ii and 2 -c -ii, it is indicated that the size would be approximately 24" x 24" or <br />larger (if appropriate). <br />Alice Gordon <br />Given below is the revised policy proposed by Commissioner Gordon (with changes approved <br />by the Board) <br />ORANGE COUNTY POLICY FOR CRAFTING AND INSTALLING COMMEMORATIVE <br />PLAQUES FOR COUNTY OWNED BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES <br />