Browse
Search
Minutes 01-31-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 01-31-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2014 12:54:59 PM
Creation date
3/11/2014 10:37:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/11/2014
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 01-31-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-31-2014 - BOCC Retreat
Agenda - 01-31-2014 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-31-2014 - BOCC Retreat
Agenda - 01-31-2014 - a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 01-31-2014 - BOCC Retreat
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Michael Talbert said they do not have a strategic plan for solid waste. They continue to <br /> meet to examine new technologies. They closed the landfill a year ago and the <br /> interlocal agreement essentially lapsed at that point. They are trying to reinitiate that <br /> with their recycling efforts. There is not a master plan on what to do with solid waste in <br /> 5-10 years. They will continue to look at options. Right now, everything is going <br /> through Durham as the Board approved. That is a temporary short term solution — <br /> there is no long term solution. He thinks they are probably not going to site a new <br /> landfill. <br /> Chair Jacobs said the managers are trying to work on a 5 year plan to work together. A <br /> strategic plan is predicated on having partners first. The Board asked the Manager and <br /> staff to try to develop a new agreement to succeed the old one, but that's when Chapel <br /> Hill decided to bid itself out separately. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked when does the short term solution become the long term <br /> solution. She said she wondered when the County would think about being more <br /> responsible for our own trash as opposed to sending it to Durham. She noted that <br /> there may not be an answer to that right now. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said they do need the partnerships because Orange County by <br /> itself generates so little. She agreed with the Manager that they will not site another <br /> landfill in Orange County. There is a lot of technology out there being developed that is <br /> not ready yet. For a county of our size, there isn't a clear answer out there. She said <br /> they may need to partner with others, not just the local towns but maybe Durham. <br /> Chair Jacobs said he and others met with the Durham City Mayor last year and that <br /> they had explored alternative technologies — both with and without Orange County <br /> waste - and decided they were not big enough. He said they need to find a regional <br /> solution. It's easy to say the County is not doing enough, but the problem is finding <br /> technology that is cost effective and environmentally sound, without even getting into <br /> siting issues that will be awesome, especially for a regional facility. He thinks a good <br /> thing for the Board to do at this point is to list out what should be the steps and check <br /> with the Towns to see if they are on board with the steps we have articulated. <br /> Commissioner Rich said she wanted to know if technology is not ready for them, this is <br /> the year they should check into it again. Her concern is that right now they don't have <br /> a plan. <br /> Rod Visser asked the Board to consider whether they feel the objective for this <br /> segment has been met, recognizing there will be some changes to come when the <br /> Manager's recommended CIP is presented. Paul Laughton confirmed there would be <br /> some changes related to water and sewer and with solid waste as it relates to the <br /> timeline for the Eubanks Road SWCC and High Rock Road SWCC. Some numbers <br /> will change in CIP as they are still meeting with staff. The CIP includes a large Phase 1 <br /> expansion of the SportsPlex at $950,000. <br /> Rod Visser asked if any member of the Board feels strongly about providing direction to <br /> staff about making any change to any project as presented. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin inquired if the EPA matter gets resolved on Rogers Road and <br /> the Board decides to go forward with funding the sewer, would that be folded into the <br /> CIP or some other way, assuming there is consensus that there are no more <br /> impediments to moving forward and we want to proceed expeditiously <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.