Orange County NC Website
10 <br /> 1 staff to try to develop a new agreement to succeed the old one, but that's when Chapel <br /> 2 Hill decided to bid itself out separately. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Commissioner Rich asked when does the short term solution become the long term <br /> 5 solution. She said she wondered when the County would think about being more <br /> 6 responsible for our own trash as opposed to sending it to Durham. She noted that there <br /> 7 may not be an answer to that right now. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Commissioner Pelissier said they do need the partnerships because Orange County by <br /> 10 itself generates so little. She agreed with the Manager that they will not site another <br /> 11 landfill in Orange County. There is a lot of technology out there being developed that is <br /> 12 not ready yet. For a county of our size, there isn't a clear answer out there. She said <br /> 13 they may need to partner with others, not just the local towns but maybe Durham. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Chair Jacobs said he and others met with the Durham City Mayor last year and that they <br /> 16 had explored alternative technologies — both with and without Orange County waste - <br /> 17 and decided they were not big enough. He said they need to find a regional solution. <br /> 18 It's easy to say the County is not doing enough, but the problem is finding technology <br /> 19 that is cost effective and environmentally sound, without even getting into siting issues <br /> 20 that will be awesome, especially for a regional facility. He thinks a good thing for the <br /> 21 Board to do at this point is to list out what should be the steps and check with the Towns <br /> 22 to see if they are on board with the steps we have articulated. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Commissioner Rich said she wanted to know if technology is not ready for them, this is <br /> 25 the year they should check into it again. Her concern is that right now they don't have a <br /> 26 plan. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Rod Visser asked the Board to consider whether they feel the objective for this segment <br /> 29 has been met, recognizing there will be some changes to come when the Manager's <br /> 30 recommended CIP is presented. Paul Laughton confirmed there would be some <br /> 31 changes related to water and sewer and with solid waste as it relates to the timeline for <br /> 32 the Eubanks Road SWCC and High Rock Road SWCC. Some numbers will change in <br /> 33 CIP as they are still meeting with staff. The CIP includes a large Phase 1 expansion of <br /> 34 the SportsPlex at $950,000. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Rod Visser asked if any member of the Board feels strongly about providing direction to <br /> 37 staff about making any change to any project as presented. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Commissioner Dorosin inquired if the EPA matter gets resolved on Rogers Road and <br /> 40 the Board decides to go forward with funding the sewer, would that be folded into the <br /> 41 CIP or some other way, assuming there is consensus that there are no more <br /> 42 impediments to moving forward and we want to proceed expeditiously <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Michael Talbert said the short answer is "yes". The managers are working on a plan, as <br /> 45 instructed by the task force, on how to make this happen and how to make this work. <br /> 46 He believes the County and Chapel Hill are on board with funding 43% shares <br /> 47 (Carrboro's share would be 14%) and with moving forward on at least initial planning for <br /> 48 sewer, including engineering. He sees longer term CIP funding — not next year, but <br /> 49 maybe two years out—for funding for actual construction. <br /> 50 <br /> 51 Commissioner Dorosin inquired do they have resources to start or would there need to <br /> 52 be adjustments to this CIP. <br /> 53 <br /> 54 Michael Talbert said funding would be in the general CIP. They would have to evaluate <br /> 55 resources and priorities. They have the money to do the planning stages. In two years, <br />