Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-06-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 03-06-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-06-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 3:53:17 PM
Creation date
2/28/2014 3:52:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/6/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-06-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br /> 1 Commissioner Price said this was discussed, and the thought was that the infrastructure <br /> 2 needed for the fair would go toward what was needed for the park. She said one example is <br /> 3 the entry road, which would serve both the park and the fair. <br /> 4 Commissioner Dorosin said the idea was just to move the park plan up. <br /> 5 Commissioner Pelissier said she would like staff to tell exactly how this fits into the park <br /> 6 plans. <br /> 7 Commissioner McKee said he attended the information session. He agreed that there <br /> 8 were some enthusiastic recommendations, but there were also some concerns about this fair <br /> 9 affecting the existing events in the county. He said there are concerns about conflicts with <br /> 10 Hogg Day, as well as the 4-H livestock show that has been held in April for the past 60 years. <br /> 11 He said this livestock show requires a high number of volunteers, as will the fair. He said his <br /> 12 concern is that this will take a lot of paid county staff. <br /> 13 Commissioner McKee questioned what would be moved back for the CIP dollars, and <br /> 14 what will not be provided that is being provided now. He asked if the idea is to have a tax <br /> 15 increase in order to accomplish the additional spending. He said this would only apply if a <br /> 16 large amount of money is spent, but there is no framework to know how much money this will <br /> 17 be. He is concerned about just the cost of the road being put in. He can foresee the <br /> 18 infrastructure price going as high as a million dollars. <br /> 19 Chair Jacobs said it is not realistic that this will ready in 18 months, because this is <br /> 20 County government, and the wheels move slowly. He said a realistic schedule needs to be set. <br /> 21 He said the group did a great job of getting to the point of the hard questions being asked. <br /> 22 Michael Talbert said the group can meet again, and the information will probably come <br /> 23 back in to the Board in January. He said a timeline will happen. He said there will be capital <br /> 24 improvements to the site and the amount depends on the size and scope. He said the entire <br /> 25 scope of the fair has not been defined. He asked if this is what the Board wants to see. <br /> 26 Chair Jacobs said yes. <br /> 27 Michael Talbert said the group can come back with size and scope and complexity in <br /> 28 January. He agreed that 18 months is not realistic. <br /> 29 Chair Jacobs said this is not meant to discourage the group, but now the questions are <br /> 30 getting more serious. <br /> 31 Commissioner Dorosin said all of the concerns raised by the Board have already been <br /> 32 discussed in the committee meetings. He said there is an event almost every weekend in <br /> 33 Orange County, so there is always a conflict. He noted that a successful event was held at <br /> 34 Blackwood Farm two years ago with no additional infrastructure. <br /> 35 He said this event could start off small scale and grow. He said he does not agree that <br /> 36 the County shouldn't put money into the event. He feels this event is important and is of value <br /> 37 to the community <br /> 38 <br /> 39 5. Redesigned County Logo <br /> 40 Michael Talbert said there was a recommendation by the Board to get a review <br /> 41 committee together to look at the logo. He said the committee included Commissioner Price <br /> 42 and Commissioner Rich, and logo options were reviewed. He noted the preferred option, as <br /> 43 well as the other options being put before the Board. <br /> 44 Commissioner Price said the point was to have something clean and simple that <br /> 45 conveyed something about Orange County. She said the committee looked at what parks and <br /> 46 recreation had used and then made some modifications. She said this logo depicts the Eno <br /> 47 River that runs through Orange County, as well as the County's concern for agriculture, green <br /> 48 space, and walking. She discussed the other logo options. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.