Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-24-2014 - C4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 02-24-2014 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 02-24-2014 - C4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 10:45:40 AM
Creation date
2/17/2014 2:03:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/18/2014
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C6
Document Relationships
Minutes 02-24-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
93 <br />(4) Where applicable, the front yard setback shall be measured from any future right - <br />of -war as designated on the Orange County Comprehensive Transportation <br />Plan' . <br />(5) Although a portion of the Efland Village Overlay District is within the Major <br />Transportation Corridor (MTC) Overlay District, the requirements of the MTC do <br />not apply. The parcels are included in the MTC only because they fall within the <br />prescribed distance criteria but do not fall under any existing requirements <br />pertaining to the MTC. 19 <br />(6) If Building Height Limitation modifications are pursued in accordance with <br />Section 6.2.2(A), in no case shall building height exceed 40 feet. 20 <br />(C) Yard Encroachments <br />(1) No fences shall be permitted in the front yard of lots, other than those used for <br />single - family detached residential purposes, unless a demonstrated need can be <br />shown.21 <br />(2) Chain link or similar fencing shall not be permitted for uses other than single - <br />family detached residential. <br />mrod • elak I ' 30' 4 IF—M d lei owel ' ■•R� <br />4.7.1 Intent <br />It is the intent of Orange County to protect and enhance those natural and environ tal <br />features which constitute important physical, aesthetic, recreational, and econo 'c <br />ets through the provision of special controls of public and private develo ent along <br />majo ransportation corridors. <br />(B) The Boar County Commissioners finds as a fact that - <br />(1) Major tra ortation corridors serve a key function i e orderly development of <br />Orange Coun as major traffic movers, as well serve as entrances to Orange <br />County from outs the area. <br />(2) These corridors and the aracter of development which occurs along them <br />establish for visitors and res" nt ike an indicator of the quality of life in the <br />County, as well as the efficie d safety of traffic movement through the area. <br />(3) In addition, the ability of efferent areas the County to attract and <br />accommodate differ t types of developm depends on the capacity of the <br />thoroughfare s m and the character and qu " of development along major <br />corridors. <br />(C) The Major Tr portation Corridor district is intended to enhance attractiveness and <br />orderly de opment of land adjacent to major transportation facilities ough the <br />provis. of a set of development standards and regulations for applicatio public and <br />pr' to development of land adjacent to these corridors. The major transporta <br />corridors include the interstate system as designated in the adopted Comprehensi <br />Plan. <br />" Users should note the Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan is currently being developed; it has not <br />yet been adopted. <br />19 This language is suggested so that it's clear that none of the requirements of the MTC apply to the parcels in this <br />geographic area that are also located within the MTC. The MTC boundary is based on distance from the <br />interstate /interchanges but none of the parcels in this area fall under the text requirements of the MTC. <br />20 Some of the zoning districts that could be applied in a CITAN allow buildings taller than 40 feet. A building <br />height limitation of 40 -feet is suggested in order to maintain an urban village character. <br />2' The fencing regulations [(1) and (2)] are in keeping with the ECOD regulations in order to discourage unaesthetic <br />fencing in the front yards of properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.